Why Greta Thunberg Doesn’t Deserve A Nobel

Written by Ella Whelan

Greta Thunberg activist protest

Greta Thunberg – the stern 16-year-old voice and face of the recent school climate-strike movement – has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Thunberg first made headlines when she skipped school on 20 August last year in her hometown in Sweden to protest outside parliament, holding a homemade placard reading ‘skolstrejk för klimatet’ (school strike for climate).

Since then, she has inspired schoolkids across the world to ‘strike’, missing school to protest against what they argue is a climate crisis.

Thunberg says the prospect of global warming and a changing climate frightened her – and so she decided to speak out.

…snip…

She has come to symbolize a new movement, with youngsters echoing her mantra: ‘Why should I go to school to study if there is no future?’

Politicians have celebrated her bravery, activists have saluted her conviction, and greens everywhere have kicked themselves for not doing something similar when they were in their teens.

Thunberg’s Nobel nomination has provoked some criticism. Not because of her age (after all, Malala Yousafzai won the award in 2014), but because of her lack of tangible achievements.

The founder of the Nobel prizes, Swedish businessman Alfred Nobel, left instructions in his will that the peace prize should be awarded to ‘the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations and the abolition or reduction of standing armies and the formation and spreading of peace congresses’.

It’s unclear that Thunberg meets that standard.

Then again, the Nobel has become less about the specific achievements of the winner and more about the message the award sends. U.S. President Barack Obama won it in 2009 after being in office for less than a year.

So it is with Thunberg – the committee seems to want to send a message about its support for climate issues and youth activism, rather than award her specific accomplishments.

But the admiration for this rather eccentric young woman’s protest also sends a rather worrying message about the current state of adult authority.

It is strange that teachers, politicians, and parents are cheering on children whose message is ‘I’m too scared to go to school’.

Read rest at Spiked-Online

Comments (8)

  • Avatar

    Squidly

    |

    Eh, who cares? .. The Nobel Prizes have become a sad joke.

    • Avatar

      Herb Rose

      |

      Hi Squifify,
      Actually the Nobel Prizes have become a sad tragedy instead of a sad joke. Instead of scientists trying to advance science with new discoveries their goal is to win the prize by finding anything (no matter how strained) to show the experts awarding the prize that they are right. It is no longer about discovery but about confirming orthodoxy.
      Have a good day,
      Herb

      • Avatar

        Geraint Hughes

        |

        Herb, I agree. Its just politics, it is no longer science, its a real shame because it is scientists that need the money more.

  • Avatar

    Geaint Hughes

    |

    Herb, I agree. It is just politics, not science, which is a real shame because it is real scientists that need the money more.

  • Avatar

    Graeme Mochrie

    |

    Why are we frightening our children? Who will benefit from this? Who is encouraging it? Starved of publicity, things fizzle out, but this has been much publicised. Presumably people with large investment in renewables are encouraging the children in a similar way that JD Rockefeller encouraged the temperance movement in order to remove competition from ethanol. The same interest group no doubt controls the Nobel Prize committee.

  • Avatar

    sunsettommy

    |

    First rule of good parenting: DO NOT scare the children with doomsday talk of the future!

  • Avatar

    K. Kaiser

    |

    I suspect that Alfred (Nobel) would turn in his grave upon hearing the idea of Greta being considered for the Peace Prize.

Comments are closed