Why a ‘Super’ Grand Solar Minimum Is Upon Us
Professor Zharkova gave a presentation of her Climate and the Solar Magnetic Field hypothesis at the Global Warming Policy Foundation in October, 2018. Even if you believe the IPCC’s worst case scenario, Zharkova’s analysis blows any ‘warming’ out of the water.
Lee Wheelbarger sums it up: even if the IPCC’s worst case scenarios are seen, that’s only a 1.5 watts per square meter increase. Zharkova’s analysis shows a 8 watts per square meter decrease in TSI to the planet.
The information she unveiled should shake/wake you up. Zharkova was one of the few that correctly predicted solar cycle 24 would be weaker than cycle 23 – only 2 out of 150 models predicted this. Her models have run at a 93{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} accuracy and her findings suggest a SuperGrand Solar Minimum is on the cards beginning 2020 and running for 350-400 years.
Trackback from your site.
GordR
| #
One huge problem with the video that was easy to check is the person being interviewed is saying that the earth is farthest from the sun during the NH’s winter. That is not correct according to other sources.
https://www.space.com/3304-earth-closest-sun-dead-winter.html
and here
https://www.timeanddate.com/astronomy/perihelion-aphelion-solstice.html
Reply
Richi
| #
Well, GordR, everybody should be VERY careful in believing what Lee Wheelbarger is talking about… better check the sources…
Reply
GordR
| #
Oops, after watching it again, I think I misunderstood what he was saying.
He was talking about the Milankovitch cycles, and especially precession.
I think what he was suggesting is that the earth may be moving away from the perihelion phase of it’s precession orbit and suggesting that this may make our winter even colder in the NH. With a period of 23,000 years, I won’t make any meaningful difference in the next couple of hundred years which is why I misunderstood him to be talking about just the current precession location.
Reply
Mard
| #
we are actually going to experience an orbit change in the 2020s, this is due to the pull from the larger planets, The larger planets [Jupiter, Uranus, Saturn, and Neptune] will all be in the same area of the solar system. it will elongate our orbit causing winters in the northern hemisphere to be much colder, the orbit change will be small, however, the inverse square law tells us we will get a lot less warmth from the already dimming sun, coupled with the solar minimum we are about to go into means big trouble. You can check this yourself by using an online orbit simulator like https://www.solarsystemscope.com/ fast forward to 2025, remember that the planets are not so close to each other but a lot further out than it appears on the simulator. its just to get a basic handle on the concept..Enjoy!
Reply
Guy
| #
Nonsense. The larger planets have lined up on the same side of the sun several times in just the past 50 years, with no significant change in our orbit which effected our seasons. You should be familiar with some of the dates as they typically are used by doomsday date setters. You know what else follows the inverse square law, gravity. Jupiter is 5 times further from us than the sun, saturn almost 10, and the farthest, Neptune is 30 times further. Yet the Sun, makes up 99% of the total mass in the solar system – the other thing that gravity depends on. Its mind blowing how some of you can accept these sort of predictions yet reject well tested science. Confirmation bias is a powerful thing.
Reply
Starships n stev
| #
Valentina will be doing an interview with Jake and Mari on the grand solar minimum channel. Check this one out. https://youtu.be/TEJ2bBpy7pk
Reply
Jippy
| #
I’ll stick with John Casey’s prediction. It will be a Dalton level minimum and the temps will be similar to the 1950s and 60s. Still challenging but not the end of the world. As far as the inverse square law goes, the lower the temperature predictions the number of YouTube views goes up by the square.
🙂
Reply