Video: What Archaeologists Don’t Want You To Know

Comet impact 'linked' to rise of mammals - BBC News

Graham Hancock discusses the evidence for a cataclysmic event 12,800 years ago which, he says, many academics would rather you didn’t know about. This short video is an introduction to a fascinating new theory of mass extinction due to a comet impact that ended the last ice age.


PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.

Comments (3)

  • Avatar

    jerry krause

    |

    Hi Graham,

    You wrote: “This short video is an introduction to a fascinating new theory of mass extinction due to a comet impact that ended the last ice age.”

    Your theory is not exactly new and censorship by a scientific (or ‘intellectual’) community is not exactly new. Have you read about Galileo’s trials? After WWII Immanuel Velikovsky in Worlds in Collision proposed what are proposing except, as I remember, he did not try to give a date for the comet (Venus) which drastically altered the earth and life upon it. But he referred to animals which were suddenly frozen in place at high northern latitudes. Hence, it seemed that his event did not occur during an ice age when the earth was covered with thick glaciers at high northern latitudes.

    It is the geological community which dates the earth’s history and they have not had a good track record. They did not see the evidences that there were ‘ice ages’. Louis Agassiz, an naturalist whose scholarly interest at the time he saw erratic boulders and their reasonable consequences, was the study of prehistoric fish fossils. Then Alfred Wegener, a meteorologist, based upon observations, proposed that continents, Africa and South America, had drifted apart. And beginning a little after 1930, I have read, no geologists dared to suggest that continents could drift for about 50 years.

    Your theory may be ‘right’ but it certainly is not a new idea and nor is the fact that history shows that most, but not all, people, who have accepted an wrong idea, do not willingly give up the wrong idea. And this close-minded common human behavior is not limited to scientists.

    Have a good day, Jerry

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via