Three-minute Video Exposes CO2 Climate Baloney

# 1 Choice - Private Investigator | Private Detective - St ...

This helpful 3-minute Australian video puts carbon dioxide and climate change in perspective. You get the whole message in the first 30 seconds.

Using the visual aid of a pile of rice beside a grain of rice to demonstrate how little CO2 humans add to the atmosphere, Malcolm Roberts explains the utter absurdity of claims humans are dangerously altering the climate.

The Rice Video – Carbon Dioxide in perspective by The Galileo Movement

Here are the references mentioned in the video:

Reference 1 and 2 http://www.galileomovement.com.au/doc… and http://www.galileomovement.com.au/sci… and pages 1-4 of http://www.galileomovement.com.au/doc… Reference 3: 2:17: http://www.galileomovement.com.au/sci… and pages 1-4 here: http://www.galileomovement.com.au/doc… and http://www.galileomovement.com.au/doc… Reference 4 http://www.galileomovement.com.au/doc… and http://Tome22.info/Top/Articles.html and http://Tome22.info/Top/AnnotatedDocum… and http://Tome22.info/ 5% Reduction in Carbon emissions by 2020 – statement to Parliament accompanying the tabling of the legislation for the Carbon Tax. $72 billion – http://www.minerals.org.au/file_uploa…


PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.

Comments (28)

  • Avatar

    Thomas Pearson

    |

    I have pointed this out many times, in many places on how little humans release in a year, which was usually around the 2.5% yearly amount while nature does the other 97.5%.

    Also have pointed out that a very small portion of that 2.5% emitted going into the ocean can’t overcome the already estimated 99.99% of the FREE CO2 of the planet in the waters. Thus we can’t be blamed for the bogus “acidification” nonsense.

    Most people have no idea on how to scale small things against large things.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Judy Ryan

    |

    It must have been about 2009 when I saw the rice video at a U3A presentation. I emailed Malcolm Roberts at the Galileo movement the next day and have been a volunteer for the Galileo movement ever since. It is a fantastic video and we need to spread it again and again ad nauseam if necessary . The other pivotal moment in that course was the exposure of the climate gate emails.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Dave Taylor

    |

    Thanks for posting this. A picture–in this case a moving picture–is worth a thousand words in discussing the relative amounts of CO2 and their source. Nicely done.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Jennifer Allen

    |

    How do we get this message out to the masses? The politicians have the front page news on ‘climate change’ and are ramming the carbon tax down our throats by creating a climate of fear which people believe. We need more people like you and Jordan Peterson, to speak to universities and schools where young minds are sucking up all the incorrect information that climate fear mongers are pumping out.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    jerry krause

    |

    Hi Jennifer,

    The video is an argument and good science is not based upon good arguments; good science is only based on good observations (measurements) of the system being studied. The systems, which are involved in the earth’s radiation balance system, which are involved in weather systems, which is involved with atmospheric circulation systems is not an artificial laboratory system, is not an artificial computer system; it is only the actual natural system which is involved.

    In the USA our government is funding the NOAA Surfrad and USCRN projects, the Department of Agriculture SCAN project, and the RAWS project (multiple agencies). No other nation is funding such projects. Some of this USA ‘natural’ data has been observed for two decades and at a minimum for nearly a decade. Yet, I only learned of the RAWS project less than 6 months ago, and the USCRN project about a year ago. And of the other two for only a few years ago.

    The reason for this is it seems no one has been using this data to better understand these natural systems for any reason, and if they have the evidence is that they haven’t sharing what they learned by considering this data.

    Air temperatures, about 1.5 meters above the surface, have been routinely measured most everywhere for more than a century and this is the only temperature which is routinely being considered to exist.

    Jennifer, until you and many others recognize there are other fundamental temperatures (like surface, soil, dew point, wet bulb, sea surface) beside air temperature, there is no good message to get out to the masses.

    Have a good day, Jerry

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via