Scientists and Studies predict ‘imminent global COOLING’

Written by Marc Morano

Growing number of scientists are predicting global cooling: Russia’s Pulkovo Observatory: ‘We could be in for a cooling period that lasts 200-250 years’

Danish Solar Scientist Svensmark declares ‘global warming has stopped and a cooling is beginning…enjoy global warming while it lasts’

New paper by Russian solar physicist by Habibullo Abdussamatov predicts another Little Ice Age within the next 30 years

Meteorologist Joe Bastardi on declining global temps: ‘Has the Obama administration, the EPA or anyone that can read a chart actually looked at what global temperatures are now doing?’

Climate Scientist Prof. Anastasios Tsonis at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Predicts: ‘I would assume something like another 15 years of leveling off or cooling’

Prominent geologist Dr. Don Easterbrook warns ‘global COOLING is almost a slam dunk’ for up to 30 years or more

Australian Astronomical Society warns of global COOLING as Sun’s activity ‘significantly diminishes’

Climate Depot Exclusive Round Up of Global Cooling  Predictions – June 2014 

Aussie Scientist Dr. David Evans: New solar theory predicts imminent global cooling: Dr. David Evans: As we head to the UNFCCC meeting in Paris 2015 where global bureaucracy beckons, a sharp cooling change appears to be developing and set to hit in the next five years. Yet consortia of five-star politicians are not preparing for climate change, only for global warming. Around the world a billion dollars a day is invested in renewable energy, largely with the hope of changing the weather. Given that 20% of the world does not even have access to electricity, history books may marvel at how screwed priorities were, and how bureaucratized science cost so much more than the price of the grants.

‘Global cooling imminent’: ‘Sharp cooling’ to hit in the next five years, says new solar theory

German Geologist Dr. Sebastian Lüning: UN IPCC Models A Failure, ‘Have No Chance Of Success’…Sees Possible 0.2°C Of Cooling By 2020 – His charts show that solar activity correlates well with temperature, which Lüning calls “a surprisingly good match”. He then presents the various solar cycles that the sun undergoes, going into the works of Gerard Bond, who made temperature reconstructions using layers of ice-rafted material in the North Atlantic. Lüning calls the synchronicity between solar activity and temperature found by Bond “stunning”.

U.S. sees ‘slight cooling trend’ since 2005 – NOAA shows ‘the pause’ in the U.S. surface temperature record over nearly a decade – U.S. cools from 2005 through 2014: U.S. sees ‘slight cooling trend’ since 2005 – NOAA shows ‘the pause’ in the U.S. surface temperature record over nearly a decade

New paper by Russian solar physicist by Habibullo Abdussamatov predicts another Little Ice Age within the next 30 years

Meteorologist Joe Bastardi on declining global temps: ‘Has the admin, the EPA or anyone that can read a chart actually looked at what global temps are now doing?’

Global Temperature Standstill May Last 30 Years, Climate Scientist Predicts: Prof. Anastasios Tsonis at the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee,: ‘I would assume something like another 15 years of leveling off or cooling’

New Research Paper Predicts 15 Years Of Cooling: 2012–2027 is predicted to fall slightly over the next decades, due to the recent weakening of the North Atlantic Oscillation

New paper predicts temperature decrease by 2020 of up to 1C due to low solar activity for certain locations – Published in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics

New paper predicts solar activity will decline over 21st century to average Holocene levels – Published in Climate of the Past

Earth’s All Time Record High Temp Set in 1913 — Earth’s All Time Record Low Set in 2010 & 2nd All Time Record Low Set in 2013 — ‘What would warmists say if the dates were reversed?’

Climate Scientist Who Got It Right Predicts 20 More Years of Global Cooling – ‘For the next 20 years, I predict global cooling of about 3/10ths of a degree Fahrenheit, as opposed to the one-degree warming predicted by the IPCC,” said [Geologist Dr. Don Easterbrook, professor emeritus of geology at Western Washington University and  author of 150 scientific journal articles and 10 books, including “Evidence Based Climate Science,” which was published in 2011.

‘The Climate Scientist Who Got It Right’: In 1996, CSU’s Dr. Bill Gray predicted weak cooling for the next 20-30 years’

Major Danish Daily Newspaper Warns: ‘Globe May Be On Path To Little Ice Age…Much Colder Winters…Dramatic Consequences’! – Paper features Danish solar physicist Henrik Svensmark on the subject of the UN IPCC: ‘…many of the climate models used by IPCC and others overestimate the influence of CO2 and underestimate the influence of the sun. … The IPCC is very one-sided, so I don’t think there will be anything reasonable in the next report.’

Geologist Dr. David Deming: ‘If the current cooling trend continues, the theory of global warming faces imminent extinction’ – Deming: ‘The mean global temperature has not risen in 17 years and has been slowly falling for approximately the past 10 years’ – ‘Falling temperatures are giving climate alarmists chills’

Bundle Up! German scientists predict a century of global cooling – Two German scientists, Horst-Joachin Luedecke and Carl-Otto Weiss of the European Institute for Climate and Energy, say that “two naturally occurring climate cycles will combine to lower global temperatures during the next century.” They added, “by the year 2100, temperatures on this planet will plunge to levels seen at the end of the ‘Little Ice Age’ in 1870.” These researchers used historical data detailing temperatures as well as cave stalagmites to show a recurring 200-year solar cycle called the DeVries Cycle.

CERN scientist Jasper Kirkby says another Maunder Minimum in solar activity could occur by 2015 – Jasper Kirkby, head of the CLOUD Experiment at CERN in Geneva notes in the video lecture below that if one extrapolates the current lull in solar activity, an extended period of no sunspots similar to the Maunder Minimum could occur by 2015. The Maunder Minimum was responsible for the Little Ice Age and lasted for 70 years.

Sunspot Enigma: Will Inactive Sun Cause Global Cooling? ‘Earth’s response to low solar activity will overturn many of our assumptions about man’s influence on climate change. Cold not warmth might be our future’

Better Get your Woollies! ‘No doubt about it. The Earth’s climate is cooling!’ — Essay by Environmental Chemist By Dr. Klaus L.E. Kaiser – ‘The question now is solely ‘when, not if’ the current interglacial period will come to a sudden end. Nature had an earlier attempt at it when, in the mid-1600’s, the world experienced a cold spell lasting some 60 years which is now commonly known as the medieval “Little Ice Age.” That period coincided with the “Maunder Minimum,” an unusual low number of sunspots through several sunspot cycles

Sun’s bizarre activity may trigger another ice age, says Irish solar scientist – ‘Solar activity has been falling steadily since mid-1940s, a change that in the past triggered a 300-year-long mini ice age’

Russian Academy of Sciences: Global warming over in Central Asia – Current Temps Not ‘Unique’; Cooler era ahead – Global warming is over in Central Asia, and a new cooler period is ahead, according to Russian Academy of Sciences scientist Andrei Daryin – ‘Whenever we look a thousand years back, it appears that the situation is not that unique. A temperature rise comparable with today’s parameters already happened 1,000 years ago,’ he said. In fact, climate change cycles correlate with solar activity, the expert continued.

Geologist Dr. Norman Page: ‘The Coming Cooling’ – ‘The Demise of the UN IPCC and the CAGW (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming) Delusion’ – ‘The IPCC’s remit was never to study climate objectively but to support the proposition  that anthropogenic CO2 was the main climate driver and that increasing emissions would produce warming with catastrophic consequences by the end of the 21st century. To their eternal discredit too many of the Western scientific establishment  abandoned common sense and scientific standards of objectivity and prudence in order to accommodate their paymasters.’

BBC: UK Climate Scientist Warns: Real Risk Of A Maunder Minimum ‘Little Ice Age’ Due To ‘Decline in Solar Activity’

Geologist E. Kirsten Peters: She warns cold spell near? – Geologist digs deeper on climate change

Japanese researcher predicts cooler climate in Northern Hemisphere from 2015 – ‘A Japanese scientist who analyzed ocean temperatures stretching back more than five decades has predicted that the climate in the Northern Hemisphere may enter a cooling period around 2015. Mototaka Nakamura, a senior scientist at the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, analyzed surface temperatures of the Greenland Sea from 1957 to the present and how they affect climate change. He said Greenland Sea temperatures could serve as a leading indicator of cooling and warming cycles in North Atlantic waters, which are believed to alternate on about 70-year cycles.

New Book by David Archibald: ‘The Twilight of Abundance’ – Warns of Global Cooling – ‘Why Life in the 21st Century Will Be Nasty, Brutish, and Short’

New paper finds ‘surprisingly, there are many US weather stations that show cooling’ over the past century – Published in the Journal of Climate – Study ‘finds, contrary to popular belief, that US “monthly maximum temperatures are not often greatly changing — perhaps surprisingly, there are many stations that show some cooling [over the past century]. In contrast, the minimum temperatures show significant warming’

New paper finds worldwide glacier retreat has decelerated since 1950 – Published in The Cryosphere

New paper shows anthropogenic emissions have had a net cooling effect since beginning of industrial revolution – Published in Science – Study reports the transition from “pristine” to “slightly polluted” atmosphere at the beginning of the industrial revolution in the 18th century had a “dramatic aerosol effect [of increasing] clouds” over the oceans.’

German Geologist Dr. Sebastian Lüning: ‘Greenland is cooling’ – Greenland was ’2 – 3°C warmer 6000 to 4000 years ago than it is today’ and that the ice survived – ‘Greenland is cooling’: Lüning brings up the Axforf paper of 2013, which shows Greenland was “2 – 3°C warmer 6000 to 4000 years ago than it is today” and that the ice survived. He presents a 2013 paper by Lecavalier et al showing that Greenland has cooled 2.5°C over the last 8000 years. Despite the thousands of years of continuous warmth, the dramatic ice collapse never occurred.”

Coming global cooling? Aussie Solar Expert David Archibald: ‘Lower solar irradiance will result in lower temperatures on this planet. It is a question of when.’

Read more at www.climatedepot.com

Comments (5)

  • Avatar

    Dean Jackson

    |

    “Scientists and Studies predict ‘imminent global COOLING’”

    Not if cooling carbon dioxide levels sharply fall…

    What determines an atmospheric gas’ potential heat capacity? Anyone know? Anyone take high school physical science or physics? What physical feature of a gas determines what the gas is capable of ingesting regarding heat? Don’t remember? Does VOLUME ring a bell? Ahhh…volume! Yes, volume. So let’s take a look at the volumes of carbon dioxide, oxygen and nitrogen at 1 atmosphere/70 F* …

    One pound of Carbon Dioxide has a volume of 8.7 cubic feet,

    Oxygen is at 12.1 cubic feet.

    Nitrogen is at 13.8 cubic feet

    With a smaller volume than either Nitrogen and Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide can only possess LESS heat than Nitrogen and Oxygen, and when more COOLER carbon dioxide is pumped into the Nitrogen-Oxygen based atmosphere (>99% of the atmosphere’s gasses), the result can only be a COOLING of the atmosphere. As demonstrated by the three volumes illustrated for Carbon Dioxide, Oxygen and Nitrogen, Carbon Dioxide holds approximately one-third less heat than either Nitrogen or Oxygen, proving Carbon Dioxide’s cooling effect on the atmosphere. Therefore, when the volume of any planet’s atmosphere is increased by additions of a cooler trace gas, such as Carbon Dioxide is on Earth, the result can only be a cooling of the planet, all other variables remaining constant. And if other variables should increase the heat of a planet, such as increased radiation from the planet’s star(s), then the additional trace gas will have a relative cooling effect on the planet. How precisely does this cooling effect take place? As Carbon Dioxide levels increase, consequently also increasing the atmosphere’s volume, the lower specific heat (below, see Fast Science At Ridgemont High) of the Carbon Dioxide molecules dictates that (1) the Carbon Dioxide molecules will extract heat from neighboring Nitrogen and Oxygen molecules; which will (2) lower the heat capacity of Nitrogen and Oxygen; thereby (3) reducing global temperatures.**

    To better grasp this fact, let’s use a more familiar everyday experience we witness involving water: When a small amount of cooler water is added to a larger warmer body of water, the result is a cooling of the water.

    The heat obtained by both Nitrogen and Oxygen comes from (1) thermals (the direct transfer of warmer heat emanating from the ground that’s absorbed by cooler Nitrogen-Oxygen molecules);

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bb/The-NASA-Earth%27s-Energy-Budget-Poster-Radiant-Energy-System-satellite-infrared-radiation-fluxes.jpg

    (2) latent heat (the transfer of heat from warmer water vapor to cooler Nitrogen-Oxygen molecules); (3) heat produced by incoming radiation absorbed directly by the atmosphere, not solely from the absorption of outgoing IR; and (4) man-made structures on the ground. The warmth that blankets us each day is due to Nitrogen and Oxygen, not the puny amounts of the trace gas Carbon Dioxide, nor any of the other trace gasses.

    Now you have the science behind the blatant fraud that is ‘climate change’.

    So what is warming the planet, you ask? Man-made structures on the ground. Regarding man-made structures on the ground, interestingly NASA’s ‘earth’s energy budget’ illustration fails to provide the data on the amount of solar radiation absorbed by those structures, and it is the massive growth of urban sprawl the last sixty years that accounts for the atmosphere’s warming, a warming that is being tempered by increasing amounts of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere.

    Regarding man-made structures on the ground, interestingly NASA’s ‘earth’s energy budget’ illustration…

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bb/The-NASA-Earth%27s-Energy-Budget-Poster-Radiant-Energy-System-satellite-infrared-radiation-fluxes.jpg

    …fails to provide the data on the amount of solar
    radiation absorbed by those structures, and it is the massive growth of
    urban sprawl the last sixty years that accounts for the atmosphere’s
    warming, a warming that is being tempered by increasing amounts of
    Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere.

    FAST SCIENCE AT RIDGEMONT HIGH

    The greenhouse canard is repeated thousands of times a day across the United States in high school chemistry classes, proving the Marxist co-option of the West’s institutions… …

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ge0jhYDcazY

    …where the teacher instructs on the high heating effect of Carbon Dioxide, an experiment involving two jars and a heater next to each of the two jars. Carbon Dioxide is pumped into the second jar displacing the air in the jar and then both jars are heated. The temperature rises faster in the Carbon Dioxide only jar than the temperature in the first jar filled with air, thereby proving that Carbon Dioxide is a warmer molecule. What the teacher didn’t tell you is that Carbon Dioxide has a lower specific heat…

    Specific Heat of Gasses

    Specific heat means the amount of heat needed to raise the temperature of a [volume of] gas [one degree]…

    http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/spht.html

    …and because Carbon Dioxide can raise its temperature with less heat than Nitrogen and Oxygen can (Nitrogen and Oxygen have high specific heats, meaning it takes more heat to raise their temperatures), naturally the temperature of the Carbon Dioxide only jar rises faster than the predominantly Nitrogen-Oxygen jar.

    In Earth’s atmosphere, Carbon Dioxide readily heats up faster than Nitrogen and Oxygen precisely because it is a cooler molecule that can absorb a greater amount of heat in a shorter period of time than the warmer Nitrogen and Oxygen molecules. Once again…basic physics in action.

    See the article, ‘Throwing Cold Water on Global Warming’ …

    https://sites.google.com/site/deanjackson60/throwing-cold-water-on-global-warming

    So why hasn’t the ‘opposition’ to ‘climate change’ made the above observations, thereby debunking the ‘climate change’ fraud? Because the opposition is actually the ‘false’ opposition’, a strategy Marxists call the ‘Scissors Strategy’*** and use to neutralize the real opposition.

    Read the article, ‘The Marxist Co-Option Of History And The Use Of The Scissors Strategy To Manipulate History Towards The Goal Of Marxist Liberation’

    https://sites.google.com/site/deanjackson60/the-marxist-co-option-of-history-and-the-use-of-the-scissors-strategy-to-manipulate-history-towards-the-goal-of-marxist-liberation

    My blog…

    https://sites.google.com/site/deanjackson60/

    http://www.airproducts.com/products/Gases/gas-facts/conversion-formulas/weight-and-volume-equivalents/carbon-dioxide.aspx

    ** The transfer of [warmer] heat from nitrogen and oxygen to [cooler] carbon dioxide is instantaneous, as opposed to the mechanical process of infrared radiation absorption by carbon dioxide that takes time to create heat, which tells us that carbon dioxide obtains at least 95% of its heat from neighboring nitrogen and oxygen molecules.

    *** http://www.attacreport.com/ar_archives/art_na_china.htm

    Marxists utilize the tactic of employing false oppositions, more commonly referred to by Marxists as the Scissors Strategy in which the blades represent the two falsely opposed sides that converge on the confused victims, neutralizing true opposition to socialism, thereby allowing the advancement of socialism to the bewilderment of the true opposition.

  • Avatar

    Rosco

    |

    You have written this comment before – it was wrong then and remains so now ! You fail to account for mass !!

    If you calculate correctly you need the specific heat capacities per kilogram:-

    https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/specific-heat-capacity-gases-d_159.html

    Air 1.01 J/g K
    CO2 0.844 J/g K
    Nitrogen 1.04 J/g K
    Oxygen 0.919 J/g K

    You need comparable mass per volume values which you ignore completely even though you cite hyperphysics which clearly shows the calculation in terms of mass not volumes. Thus at STP 22.4 litres of ANY gas contains one mole of that gas.

    https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/molecular-weight-gas-vapor-d_1156.html

    Thus at STP the molecular mass of 22.4 litres of :-

    Air is 28.966 g
    CO2 is 44.01 g
    Nitrogen is 28.0134 g
    Oxygen is 31.9988 g

    For 22.4 litres of gas at STP and delta T = 1°C with Q = m x c x delta T.

    Air Q = 28.966 x 1.01 x 1 = 29.25566 J for 1°C increase in temperature
    CO2 Q = 44.01 x 0.844 x 1 = 37.14444 J for 1°C increase in temperature
    Nitrogen Q = 28.0134 x 1.04 x 1 = 29.133936 J for 1°C increase in temperature
    Oxygen Q = 31.9988 x 0.919 x 1 = 29.4068972 J for 1°C increase in temperature

    This falsifies your claim that a volume of CO2 at STP requires less “heat” to increase in temperature by 1°C.

    In fact CO2 requires 37.14444/29.25566 x 100 = ~127% of the energy required for air.

    The reason the CO2 bottle/jar/whatever maintains a higher temperature is due to its thermal conductivity being significantly lower than Air, Nitrogen or Oxygen.

    Air is ~164% more conductive than CO2.

    You write nonsense –
    “the Carbon Dioxide molecules will extract heat from neighboring Nitrogen and Oxygen molecules; which will (2) lower the heat capacity of Nitrogen and Oxygen;” ?

    How will the heat capacity be lowered – surely these values have been precisely measured ?

    “Carbon Dioxide readily heats up faster than Nitrogen and Oxygen precisely because it is a cooler molecule…” ??? – Silly me I thought cooler meant a lower temperature.

    Yes CO2 has a lower specific heat kg for kg compared to air but you, and many others, neglect the only important criteria of mass !

    The simple calculations above show just how wrong your assertions are.

    • Avatar

      jerry krause

      |

      Hi Rosco,

      You do a good job but it would help me if you initially named the you to whom you were referring. For the second time I had the choice the author of the posting or the author of a previous comment. In both cases I was able to conclude who the whom was, but I did initially refer back to the posting to discover it could not be the posting’s author. But do keep up the good work.

      Have a good day, Jerry

      • Avatar

        Rosco

        |

        I meant to make it a reply but during composition I simply posted it as a comment. I did say “You have written this comment before” however.

        Cheers.

        • Avatar

          jerry krause

          |

          Yes, and I missed that subtlety.

Comments are closed