On Questioning Modern Cosmology Using Empirical Evidence

Written by Edsel Chromie

Albert Einstein contributed greatly to modern physics, but was he wrong in his definition of gravity lensing? If you are less impressed with clever manipulation of mathematical equations and prefer empirical science, that which is based on verifiable observation of natural events, then the work of Edsel Chromie will interest you.

Chromie, a science writer with a background in engineering explains why a growing number of critics think Einstein and modern cosmology may have gone awry by over-reliance on pure math. He explains:

If the demonstration of rolling a ball in the depression made by a mass in the fabric of space were correct the rings of Saturn would be shaped like a bowl with instead of in a flat plane configuration. Only a swirling magnetic field current flow around the magnetic field of Saturn as discovered in the early 1900’s could cause the flat plane configuration.

 Scientists are also currently trying to detect gravity waves from the big bang. The very first creation in the vast expanse of space would be an inert atom of gas. Next would be the ionization of an atom of gas. As movie star Clint Eastwood would say, “An atom of gas cannot ionize itself.” So what the scientists should really be trying to determine is what caused the ionization of the very first ionized gas.

It is possible that static electricity was generated and discharged into a bolt of lightning that ionized many atoms of gases in a very large segment of space. This eliminates the foolish speculation of “inflation” caused by an explosion of a solid mass that could not have existed in the first place without the electromagnetic attraction of several atoms of gases necessary to create a solid particle of any kind.

This contradiction of Einstein will be considered almost sacrilegious by many scientists. The modern fashion of “peer review,” mandated by credible scientists is designed to guarantee that nobody can deviate from the acceptable official doctrine of the science community.

And, most scientists fear being ostracized and losing their credentials as a scientist if they dare to challenge the doctrine of Einstein or contradict the acceptable beliefs of the science community. This stifles any effort to achieve any advancement in science.

Einstein did not have the benefit of the space probes that have contradicted many of the beliefs of the science community and added more questions than answers to their most cherished beliefs. When the first space probes were proposed it was touted to confirm the all of the theories Einstein and the theoretical physicists have devised about the universe.

Instead, some scientists concede that many of their theories “Have been shot to hell by the space probes.” Additional space probes are being launched to try to figure out what the hell is going on that they still do not understand.

The prime factor in the confusion is the historic belief of the science community that magnetic field energy is so weak compared to gravity that it is totally irrelevant as the contributing factor to any phenomenon. Yet, the space probes have detected the involvement of magnetic field energy in almost every phenomenon that has defied explanation under the force of gravity. It was not until Aug. 12, 2010 in the “History” program the scientists finally stated, “Electricity and magnetism are one and the same thing. Magnetic storms are some of the most powerful forces in the solar system and they have been nearly completely overlooked by scientists.” And yet the scientists still consider gravity in almost every phenomenon and ignore the involvement of “weak” electromagnetic energy.

In the case of dark energy and dark matter, if you hold two magnets close together with their like poles facing each other, you can see and even feel the effect of the magnets repelling each other. Yet, you cannot really see anything between the magnets and you cannot feel anything between the magnets. The magnetic field energy actually passes right through your hand.

Yet, the scientists refuse to accept the fact that dark energy and dark matter is simply the existence of the very same magnetic field energy in the open space between the magnetic fields of all of the planets and stars. What will it take before the science community recognizes the extraordinary involvement of electromagnetic energy in the universe? Ignorance of the unknown is excusable. However, to me, this is bordering on stupidity to ignore a factor that is so clearly demonstrated and proven in order to adhere to a false belief.

Comments (5)

  • Avatar

    Al Shelton

    |

    I have been waiting for this debunking of the BBT for many years.
    The BBT is just an extrapolation backwards in time based on a falsehood. IMO.
    How can so many highly intelligent and educated human beings believe the BBT?

    • Avatar

      Squidly

      |

      I agree Al … The BBT has never made sense to me. The theories of black holes similarly make no sense to me. It is explained that black holes are so powerful that no light can escape. They further that, to an observer, the closer an object gets to the event horizon the slower it would appear to the observer, until it would appear the object is suspended indefinitely. It seems to me that if these things were true, then a black hole would not appear “black” to us, but exactly the opposite. They should be some of the brightest objects in the universe as anything falling into them would appear to us to be suspended indefinitely.

      But I digress … none of the BBT or BH theories have ever made much sense to me and they all appear to contradict one another and themselves.

      • Avatar

        Squidly

        |

        I will further add; what bothers me most about all of this is that it is so often and consistently treated not as hypothesis but as fact. That really irks me. None of these things have remotely been proven to be anything more than wild conjecture. I hate it when they are treated as factual physical law.

    • Avatar

      Joseph Olson

      |

      “Mysterious Dr X says, Universe is NOT Expanding” in archive at CanadaFreePress

      I never could swallow the dark energy, dark matter and expanding at light speed edge of the Universe meme, so I began writing about this at CFP in summer of 2010. Found a Time magazine interview, Dec 14, 1936 with the father of big bang, “Shift on Shift” where he admitted it was a hoax.

      In my article “Federally Funded Frankenscience” I discuss suppression of rotational theory.

  • Avatar

    Bill m

    |

    The comment at the beginning about Saturn’s rings is so over simplified that it is itself a mistake. Then you build the whole argument on this mistake and it then debunks your whole argument. The reason the rings are not in a bowl shape is because the reality of the gravity is not as shown. The diagram only shows Einstein’s equation in 2 dimensions and if it did exist like that then yes the rings would be bowl like. You need to think of the bending of spacetime in 3 dimensions which does not look like a planet in a punch bowl. It is a lot more complex than that. If you look at Saturn in a 3 dimensional spacetime then the rings make sense because the rings would exist in a perfect balance between the well of gravity and the centrifugal force of the planet’s rotation, which would put them in a perfect ring like formation. You lost my interest right from the beginning of the article because your theory of gravity is flawed.

Comments are closed