New Teenage Skeptic Antidote to ‘Saint Greta of Global Warming’
Youtuber and climate realist, Naomi Seibt says she became “passionate” about the topic of climate change after she “looked into the science of both sides of the spectrum” and realised “what climate skeptics say” made “a lot of sense scientifically.”
Ms Seibt she “started questioning a lot of mainstream politics” from a young age, and “got a lot of backlash from even friends and family”.
Ms Seibt said climate change is a “topic that is very heavily promoted in a very one-sided way in the mainstream media”.
“If you were to question the mainstream narrative [in school], then you would be labelled a climate change denier which is ludicrous and it’s absolutely disturbing.
“To deny something, that is a very heavy insult, especially in Germany, because it is supposed to remind you of the insult ‘holocaust denier’.”
Perhaps someone should organize a debate between Greta Thunberg and Naomi Seibt?
We know ‘Saint Greta’ is a school drop out who struggles to string two sentences together in public without being given a script to follow and her father was exposed as writing her Facebook content pretending to be her!
Watch the full video interview at www.youtube.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company 
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Joe Jarrett
| #
OMG, what a breath of
fresh air.
NAOMI, good hunting, young lady.
Joe Jarrett
Pueblo, Colorado
[email protected]
or
[email protected]
Reply
geran
| #
Does Naomi understand why the AGW/GHE nonsense is wrong? Does she understand the relevant physics?
If not, she would do terrible in a debate, as Greta has undoubtedly been thoroughly indoctrinated with the pseudoscience. To win a debate, the false science has to be squashed. That’s why “Lukewarmers” don’t help. They accept the pseudoscience, therefore there is no debate. Just watch the pathetic performance of Christy, Pielke, and Curry against Mann, in their appearance before Rep. Lamar Smith’s Committee. Mann clearly won because the 3 “Lukewarner” clowns didn’t understand the physics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eki6JC1M89k
Reply
Tom O
| #
What planet did you say you came from? Christy, Pielke, and Curry don’t understand the science? Seriously? Go crawl back under your rock.
Reply
Andy Rowlands
| #
I think they understand the science perfectly well, but are taking the ‘lukewarm’ stance to protect their funding and their jobs, and I can’t blame them for that. I would hope once they retire they become openly skeptical.
Reply
geran
| #
Tom O, did you watch the video? Have you ever studied the relevant physics?
Christy’s education is in weather, Pielke’s is in politcal science, and Curry’s is in geography.
None of the 3 understands the relevant physics. With you, that makes 4.
Reply
Zoe Phin
| #
What good does knowing the truth do if the liars will call the truth a lie, and their lie the truth?
Deny GH effect? Why you must be craaaazy!
Reply
Tom O
| #
I will first say that I am appalled at the way Greta Thunberg is used. I am also equally appalled at the way she is abused by people such as the author of this article. Someone did take the liberty of posting Greta’s grades on the internet – I rather dislike that idea, really, since she does have a right to a private life as well. Greta had all As with the exception of one B her last year in school. She isn’t a school dropout, either, since she graduated from the only schooling required, not starting her specialty training. She is a liar and a fool, but she is more than capable of stringing two sentences together, and she doesn’t deserve the degrading comments about her intelligence. And finally, I wish she would go back to school but I can’t blame anyone from insuring their financial future, even if she is on the wrong side of this particular issue which threatens the existence of civilization as we know it.
Reply
Andy Rowlands
| #
I’m also appalled the way she is being used; as a metaphorical human shield, a quite deliberate ploy so when we criticise her they can condemn us for ‘having a go’ at a child. I don’t think Greta is lying, I think she fully believes what she’s being told, so from her perspective, she is telling the truth as she understands it. I have not criticised her personally, but I have repeatedly criticised her ‘handlers’ for indoctrinating her into a non-existent problem. She is obviously intelligent, but she does have several ‘mental health issues’, which I suspect has clouded her judgement.
Reply
Andy Rowlands
| #
This is very encouraging news that Naomi Seibt has allied herself with the side of science rather than the side of fear-mongering and lies. There are a few younger people that are starting to see the scam now.
Reply
Zoe Phin
| #
I like her.
https://phzoe.wordpress.com/2020/02/12/average-moon-temperature/
Reply
Alan
| #
There is nothing in the linked video to indicate that she knows anything about science. I looked quickly at a few of her other videos and they are also devoid of any science. In a way she seems like Greta. They both have a political message but neither understand the science related to their messages.
Reply