New Study Finds No Evidence CO2 Causes Weather Blocking

On June 3, 2020, NPJ Climate and Atmospheric Science published a study by Athanasiadis et al. 2020, in which the authors investigated the question of whether changes in the frequency of blocked weather situations in the North Atlantic and Central European region are predictable.

“Quite some nonsense”

Previously, scientists inclined towards climate alarmism had told us that CO2 would lead to more and more blocked weather situations.

Quite some nonsense as it now turns out, because the blockings are more likely to be due to the 60-year AMO ocean cycle, which in turn affects the NAO. These are exciting results.

Here’s the abstract:

Decadal predictability of North Atlantic blocking and the NAO

Can multi-annual variations in the frequency of North Atlantic atmospheric blocking and mid-latitude circulation regimes be skilfully predicted?

Recent advances in seasonal forecasting have shown that mid-latitude climate variability does exhibit significant predictability. However, atmospheric predictability has generally been found to be quite limited on multi-annual timescales.

New decadal prediction experiments from NCAR are found to exhibit remarkable skill in reproducing the observed multi-annual variations of wintertime blocking frequency over the North Atlantic and of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) itself.

This is partly due to the large ensemble size that allows the predictable component of the atmospheric variability to emerge from the background chaotic component.

The predictable atmospheric anomalies represent a forced response to oceanic low-frequency variability that strongly resembles the Atlantic Multi-decadal Variability (AMV), correctly reproduced in the decadal hindcasts thanks to realistic ocean initialization and ocean dynamics.

The occurrence of blocking in certain areas of the Euro-Atlantic domain determines the concurrent circulation regime and the phase of known teleconnections, such as the NAO, consequently affecting the stormtrack and the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events.

Therefore, skillfully predicting the decadal fluctuations of blocking frequency and the NAO may be used in statistical predictions of near-term climate anomalies, and it provides a strong indication that impactful climate anomalies may also be predictable with improved dynamical models.”

By Die kalte Sonne (German text edited by P. Gosselin)

Read more at No Tricks Zone


PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.

Comments (3)

  • Avatar

    Joel Walbert

    |

    No study needed to prove this. Common sense and understand measurements in terms of ‘ppm’ is all that is required. According to dailyco2 dot com (sure that’s an eco-nut run site) today’s plant food level is 416.41 ppm which is a mere 0.0041641% of all atmospheric gases. There is no sane or rational person who could remotely argue that is somehow problematic and keep a straight face while doing it. And I feel fairly certain that this current level is much too low. All plant live would flourish with a major increase to the point of greening of deserts. The GloBULL Warming Kult is simply a Death Kult. Warmth is life.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      tom0mason

      |

      Joel Walbert,
      Oops you are out by x10. From https://www.rapidtables.com/convert/number/PPM_to_Percent.html 416.41ppm (by volume) equals a massive 0.041641% (not a mere 0.0041641%)
      /sarc-off [You are not alone in making this mistake, I’ve done it too 😉 ]

      But according to the (self declared) consensus of ‘climate scientists’, the planet is OK with atmospheric CO2 levels at or below 350ppm or 0.03500% (by volume) of all atmospheric gases (see https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/aug/26/pachauri-350ppm-breakthrough-climate ).

      Using the corrected figures …
      0.041641% – 0.03500% = 0.006641% or 66.41ppm change between being climatically OK and going into a climate catastrophe — does that sound credible? I think not!
      Even if we get to 450ppm that is still only a change of 0.01%. Hopefully the planet gets over this low amount and moves to 600ppm (or more), before the oncoming global cooling starts to deposit more CO2 into the oceans.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    jerry krause

    |

    Hi Joel and TomO

    Yes, carbon dioxide is a necessary molecule if there is to be life. But an even more critically important molecule is water which is present in our environment in great quantities but not in those land areas termed deserts. For water is a critical ‘food’ for plants just as carbon dioxide is.

    Have a good day, Jerry

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via