Dr. Fauci Exposed: Praised HCQ Treating MERS Coronavirus in 2013

NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci is amassing quite a record these past few months.

On March 20th Dr. Fauci “corrected” the president during a press briefing on hydroxychloroquine saying, “You got to be careful when you say ‘fairly effective.’ It was never done in a clinical trial… It was given to individuals and felt that maybe it worked.”

Exactly two weeks later hydroxychloroquine has been deemed the most highly rated treatment for the novel coronavirus in an international poll of more than 6,000 doctors.

Dr. Fauci was repeatedly skeptical of hydroxychloroquine’s effectiveness in treating the novel coronavirus.

But he wasn’t so skeptical back in 2013. In fact, Dr. Anthony Fauci CHEERED the use of hydroxychloroquine appeared effective “only in cells in lab dishes” in treatment of against MERS.

Via Dr. Andrew Bostom.

That is interesting. So Dr. Fauci thought a 2013 test in a “lab dish” was particularly encouraging. But in 2020 after severl successful studies of hydroxychloroquine’s effectiveness in treating coronavirus patients he was suspect. That’s weird.

Read more at www.thegatewaypundit.com


PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.

Comments (7)

  • Avatar

    Vladimir A.

    |

    You stated “This is weird”, I do not think this is weird, because if you are familiar with evolutionary biology and follow Darwin’s theory of evolution, you should understand that people evolve in their understanding and judgment of events and processes in the surrounding environment. Do you expect Dr, A. Fauci to blindly follow his ideas and opinions expressed 6 years ago? If he would do so without good arguments., I would call him a religious person, not a scientist. It is so encouraging to see such a smart and brave person correcting the president,. Everyone needs to be corrected to evolve.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Alan Stewart

      |

      Ah yes Vlad – the Age of Semantics and Political Correctness. Fauci the sycophant (ass kisser) has effed up. Twain: Politics, damned politics. We don’t have Houston, we have a problem – Washington we have a problem i(with) is Politically Correct.
      I’m 72, had a flu bug about 8 times. Rarely wash my hands (tradesman) and only got but when somebody coughed in front of me.
      WE HAVE ALMOST ZERO PROTECTION – GET IT???????????
      Cheers

      Reply

    • Avatar

      Joseph Olson

      |

      “Who Makes WHO ” by Mark Friesen > Tedros is a Tigre Liberation Front terrorist

      “Virus Task Force, Birx-Ukraine Connections” by Amazing Polly > fascist Fauci, Birx, Yovanovitch, Pence and Princess Kushy and the UN/HIV slush fund.

      Choose your “heros” wisely….there are many LIARS.

      Reply

    • Avatar

      Alan Stewart

      |

      Klaus,
      My reply to Vlad just posted.
      Cheers mate

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Joseph Olson

    |

    Plants are attacked by insects, grazing animals, mold, mildew, fungus, bacteria and viruses, and have created chemical defences. Alkaloids are one family of chemicals, including caffeine, nicotine, strychnine, psychedelic drugs and QUININE. Quinine is derived from the South American cinchona tree, and has been used by natives for millennia, by westerners since Columbus to treat malaria. Quinine is antibacterial and antiviral, natural and organic. The BIG problem with quinine is that, at ten pill for a dollar, there is no BIG profit for BIG pharma.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Tom Anderson

    |

    From “Carson News:” Fauci said on CBS’ “Face the Nation” Sunday morning. “There have been cases that show there may be an effect and there are others to show there’s no effect. So I think in terms of science, I don’t think we could definitively say it works.”

    I interpret that to mean it may not work but on the other hand it won’t do any harm. Isn’t that the beginning of the Hippocratic Oath? First do no harm? Well if there’s no harm, take the next step and try it, right?

    I think we need a second opinion.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via