Australian Study Reveals COVID-19 May Be Human Created
A forthcoming Australian scientific study concludes that the coronavirus causing the global pandemic contains unique properties suggesting it was manipulated in a Chinese laboratory and was not the result of a natural occurrence.
Five scientists who conducted the study discovered an unusual ability of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, as the pathogen behind COVID-19 is called, to easily infect humans.
The scientists said there is no sign so far that the virus can be found in other animals, including bats or the exotic wildlife sold for fresh meat at a market in the Chinese city of Wuhan, where the virus was first identified and where China maintains a major laboratory studying such viruses.
The preliminary report of the study, which is now being peer-reviewed, is based on computer modeling of the virus’ ability to infect various animals, including humans. It was published May 13 on the Cornell University website arXiv.org, which is used for discussion of pre-publication papers.
Nikolai Petrovsky, the lead researcher, said his team suspects human manipulation in Wuhan because of the unmatched ability of the virus’ protruding spike to infect human cells.
The virus’ binding strength for human cells “far exceeds” similar properties for infecting other animals, he said in a statement on the forthcoming report.
“This, plus the fact that no corresponding virus has been found to exist in nature, leads to the possibility that COVID-19 is a human-created virus,” said Mr. Petrovsky, a professor at the College of Medicine and Public Health at Flinders University in Adelaide, Australia.
Read more at www.washingtontimes.com
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY
Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
Trackback from your site.
Andy Rowlands
| #
I thought it had already been established the virus was originally created as a bioweapon?
Reply
Charles Higley
| #
It may have been developed as a bioweapon for its high infectiveness but it was not weaponized for deadliness. As an exercise, maybe, but not a finished weapon. It is not even clear which virus is the one that takes down the elderly and compromised, as they have never managed to identify ALL of the viruses any given patient has while they are ill. As the flu season is a salad of influenza and coronaviruses, any given patient may have several viruses at a time.
The public is unaware that the flu season, with our partially effective influenza vaccines, is largely and has been for decades, largely dominated by coronaviruses that are constantly popping up from animal sources. It is only the highlighting and supposed ability to track and blame one virus for deaths that the world has gone crazy. It matters not that whether this is man-manipulated or natural, it still behaves like an infectious flu virus and is relatively weak compared to influenza. That’s the real world.
Suddenly, our ignorant public has regressed to a bunch of five year olds and everybody has Cooties and no one can really prove they do not have Cooties by not being sick. The test are crappy, so everybody HAS to be assumed to have Cooties. WOW, we have devolved to a nation of mindless germaphobes and think we are being “safe.” There is not such thing as “safe” as it is not safe to get out of bed in the morning. Life is a risk very much worth taking.
It is impossible to avoid an infectious virus. It is good to try to protect the vulnerable until the rest of us have reached herd immunity but being exposed is essentially inevitable. In such can, we should be ready to offer efficient and appropriate care. Such viruses cannot be “stopped” and it is clear that lockdowns of the rest of the population is damaging and a killer in many other ways. A truly dumb idea.
Reply
Finn McCool
| #
If SARS-CoV2 was created as a bio-weapon then it was a pretty piss poor attempt.
I’m not over 75. I’m not in a care home. I have almost zero probability of dying from a ‘coronavirus’ infection.
As an economic weapon, it has been extremely successful.
I have now learned from Gove and Cummings that you should go for a drive to test your eyesight. I am fairly sure that would be at the bottom of the list of an optician’s test for visual acuity. I wonder if Cummings managed to see the rather large GlaxoSmithKline complex at Barnard Castle.
As George Bush said:
“Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.”
Reply
Josh
| #
We’ve already had this story. https://principia-scientific.com/study-evidence-shows-covid-19-was-created-in-a-lab/
This update doesn’t seem to add anything.
Reply
Zoe Phin
| #
“is based on computer modeling of the virus’ ability to infect various animals”
You mean there is nothing seen under the microscope? Not even one clip?
Reply
Finn McCool
| #
Cryo-EM and negative staining pictures do exist of the SARS-CoV2 virion particles.
Read this paper from early March
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.02.972927v1.full
It also explains how the virus genome was sequenced.
Reply