Are There Any Climate Skeptics with PhD’s in Physics?

Written by TL Winslow on January 22, 2020. Posted in Current News

This is a common question posed by low information useful idiots who swallow the doomsaying media climate narrative. Yes, of course, there are thousands of scientists qualified to the highest levels (some Nobel Prize winners, too!) that are skeptical about man-made global warming.

For those who insist on questioning my (and their) credentials, there’s a long and growing list of university-educated physicists (most junior to me) who deny the existence of CO2-driven anthropogenic global warming (AGW) warming.

It’s not about their refutations, showing a healthy open market of ideas, it’s about how closed-minded, bigoted, and bureaucratic the globalist Marxist U.N. IPCC and its controlled professional climate scientists are, squeezing all papers critical of their official orthodox position out of the academic journals.

They then claim skeptics are not “peer-reviewed” thus not worthy of consideration, as if people can’t judge for themselves and truth isn’t to be judged on its own merits. The truth is that they are protecting their income. Funny how they get paid so much but there is never enough to debunk their critics as a public service, or provide them an open uncensored forum for debate.

The IPCC CO2 hoaxers can’t win an open fair publicized debate on the physics, so no surprise their try to pull the wool over the public’s eyes with two main con games: 1) tricked-up “global average temperature” statistics, and 2) claims of a 97{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} consensus.

1. The very concept of a global average temperature is bogus, made up in a computer and thus subject to tampering at will for propaganda purposes. TL Winslow’s answer to What is the use of global temperature if it really doesn’t exist?
2. The 97{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} consensus is bogus, confusing the exact wording of questions so much that they mean nothing.
   The Bogus ‘Consensus’ Argument on Climate Change | PSI Intl

One famous example of 1) is eminent climate scientist Tim Ball, who exploded the “hockey stick” graph of Penn. State U. scientist Michael E. Mann that seems to show world temperatures er, exploding since the industrial era, but was doctored to cool the past to make the present seem hotter, exposing the fraud underpinning the CO2 AGW hoax, yet the IPCC octopus continues to preach it like the gospel truth even though Mann lost a lawsuit against Ball for defamation after allegedly refusing to produce the data behind his graph, raising suspicion of deliberate fraud (Mann denies everything and continues to back his graph):

“So there you have it. An implausible conjecture backed by false evidence and repeated incessantly has become politically correct ‘knowledge,’ and is used to promote the overturn of industrial civilization. What we will be leaving our grandchildren is not a planet damaged by industrial progress,but a record of unfathomable silliness as well as a landscape degraded by rusting wind farms and decaying solar panel arrays. False claims about 97{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} agreement will not spare us, but the willingness of scientists to keep mum is likely to reduce trust in and support for science.” – Dr. Richard Lindzen –

Here’s a beginning list of articles to see the scientific backlash to IPCC’s CO2 AGW theory, speaking truth to power – for your perusal and edification:

Paul Noel’s answer to How can anything rival the threat of climate change?

Did 30,000 scientists declare that climate change is a hoax?

William Hoffman’s answer to What are the new physics to tackle global warming?

James Matkin’s answer to People talk about scientific consensus in regard to climate change, but what is the actual specific consensus among scientists, i.e. a specific statement that most scientists agree upon?

Nima Mahdjour’s answer to As a climate change denialist, why do you not care about the world your children will have to live in?

John Walker’s answer to Where do climate change deniers get their science?

James Matkin’s answer to Why do so many people believe the effects of man-made climate change have been overestimated when the evidence is to the contrary?

James Matkin’s answer to How do you personally try and raise awareness about climate change?

James Matkin’s answer to Why does no one go after China for their greenhouse gas emissions?

Read my shortest disproof of the CO2 AGW hoax:

TL Winslow’s answer to Scientists for climate change have many proofs. Do Anti climate change scientists have any proofs of their own?

Here’s my latest list of climate change blogs, pro and anti AGW, showing the vast information available to earnest seekers.

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.