Antibody Testing: Proves We’ve Been Had!

There is simply no other way to state this. Nearly everything we’ve been told about models, rates of infection, deaths, and recoveries was inaccurate.

I’m not here to argue that it was malfeasance or ignorance — both are unacceptable. But the one thing that Governor Andrew Cuomo’s stunning announcement made clear on Thursday is that there are some pretty shocking — and what should be — reassuring truths.

Cuomo announced that antibody testing in New York state, which only began four days previous, was already demonstrating that at minimum 13.9{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} of New Yorkers, had COVID-19 late stage antibodies.

The implication of this is a shockwave to the system.

With a population of 19,540,500 the findings point out that over 2,500,000 New Yorkers had the virus and have recovered. Keep in mind that as of this writing that only 263,000 New Yorkers have currently confirmed cases. Also as of this writing New York has reported 19,543 fatalities.

We’ve been told that the true death rate is 7.4{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117} in New York. We were told there would be hundreds of thousands dead. We were told that this was worse than the flu, which has still recorded more deaths to date in this past flu season—even though the CDC instructed medical personnel to start counting influenza, heart disease, pulmonary, respiratory, drug overdose, and possibly even car crash deaths as COVID-19 deaths.

We were told that we had to upend an economy, go into solitary confinement, and divorce ourselves from normal life because this would rage beyond any previous pandemic. We were told that this virus with 846,000 current confirmed cases was worse than the H1N1 that broke out on Obama’s watch that infected 60,000,000 people. (We were conveniently not told that Obama had authorized $3.7 million U.S. tax dollars to be used at the Wuhan Institute of Virology to utilize corona viruses in bats in 2015 — but that’s yet another deception of omission.)

But none of these “truths” turned out to be so.

The death rate in New York State isn’t 7.4{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}, it is actually .75{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}. The recently ended influenza season numbers from the CDC indicate possibly 56,000,000 cases of flu, 740,000 hospitalizations, and 62,000 deaths. Under the current count from the Johns Hopkins Dashboard in this five month stretch CoVid19 has racked up 845,959 confirmed cases, 122,000 hospitalizations and 46,972 deaths.

A couple of other observations are extremely relevant. To begin with the flu — which has no vaccine but rather a randomized version of a shot designed to help develop antibodies to fight the version of the flu that “smart people” think will be the primary version that particular year — has remedies that physicians prescribe in primary care on an as needed basis.

So we’re not accustomed to thinking that the flu is this deadly killer that all of life must be shut down to prevent. CoVid19 had no known treatments at the beginning of the breakout, and for political reasons—and possibly financially incentivized ones to boot—the most effective treatment for CoVid19 became a political football. Even the supposed “negative” trials that were reported on this past weekend, had cherry picked subjects that were mostly late stage victims of the virus.

As Dr. Vladimir Zelenko pointed out on my show this week, doing so created the negative outcomes “purposefully & by design.” When used under a physician’s care, in the primary care basis, and early on after testing or onset of symptoms, the hydroxycholoroquine, azithromycin, & zinc cocktail reduced the rates of deaths and long term infectious stages. Zelenko’s numbers to date: 1,450 patients treated, two deaths, four ventilator cases (all fully recovered,) and all others recovered.

Zelenko and other physicians using the treatment are releasing the world’s largest Meta-study to date within the next few days that will examine more than 2,000 confirmed cases.

The antibody numbers from Cuomo also scream one other harsh reality. The virus was in America long before January.

No thanks to the Communist Chinese Party — who bear the sole responsibility for every American who died from CoVid19 — the infection made its way to American sooner than we had believed. With three flights a day from Wuhan to New York’s John F. Kennedy airport alone the virus was being imported faster than understood.

Since going into national lockdown we’ve also failed one other key component of recovery from this virus—herd immunity. We’ve developed not nearly enough of it. For if 2.5 million New Yorkers were able to fight it off without any treatment at all—unaware they even had it—how much more immunity did we miss out on creating by simply sheltering everyone in place?

We are well on our way to a vaccine. We’ve also got a $12 treatment with the hydroxychloroquine cocktail that has smashed Brazil’s fatality rate by 95{154653b9ea5f83bbbf00f55de12e21cba2da5b4b158a426ee0e27ae0c1b44117}.

Most importantly we’ve got millions upon millions of Americans who have been exposed to CoVid19 and who now have the late stage antibodies that demonstrate immunity.

It is time to acknowledge these facts, draw the necessary conclusions they lead us to, make changes for the benefit of the American people (for once), and end this nightmare.

Thank you Governor Cuomo for acknowledging it, now let’s go!

Read more at townhall.com


PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

Trackback from your site.

Comments (15)

  • Avatar

    Chris

    |

    This was not about the existence of a deadly disease, just the fear of one.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Roslyn Ross

    |

    Blaming the Chinese is tedious and childish. Some have said the US began fiddling in laboratories with Coronavirus and then outsourced to the Chinese. Who is to blame? Why blame anyone?

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Charles Smith

    |

    The entire time, I’ve contended that the flu was just as deadly as this “novel” virus. I’ve been vilified as people quoted the “experts”. You’ll still hear the “ten times worse than the flu” mantra during any reports made about the virus. I’m not a doctor, just a thinking person. Each year there are probably thousands of “new” viruses, none of which cause this type of reaction even when they are discovered to cause breathing problems and deaths. No, there was something more to this that we are not being told. It is almost as if they had designed a virus they thought would help with the overpopulation of the world, and then Human adaptability stepped in and screwed everything up. The arguments against using a proven remedy (Hydroxichloroquin/Azithromiacin/Zinc) put forth by the “experts” seem to be saying, “no, no, no, we have to have a vaccine, not some cheap treatment”. No, I agree with the two doctors who have recently come out to discuss the science. This lock-down has had nothing to do with science.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Tom O

      |

      Agreed. To date, there is no proof and in all reality, there probably can’t be any such proof, that the virus “escaped” from the Wuhan lab. Blaming the Chinese is convenient since we always like to have some one to blame, but it isn’t much different than blaming people who live on Manhattan Island and that worked near the Twin towers of causing them to collapse. I suppose, if any of those that lived near the towers AND were demolition experts, we might consider that.

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Tom O

        |

        I have no idea how my comment got transferred to this Charles Smith post as I actually had clicked on the red arrow above it which should have given the reply to the Roslyn Ross post. But since it did, I will use this one to point out that “yes, yes, yes they are saying “no, no, no we need a vaccine” because the intent of this media driven pandemic is to drive mandatory vaccination. And if you saw the size of the new Hitachi RFID chip, you would realize that mass vaccinations would require the use of those lovely air driven guns they used to mass vaccinate soldiers being enlisted into the services back in the 1960s, which would be able to drive that Hitachi RFID in to your shoulder at the same time. 128 bits of storage and VPN enabled, is what the literature on it said, and I can not understand why an RFID would need to be able to have a secure connection if it was just broadcasting it’s identification tag. 128 bits is a lot of yes/no answers, even if you have used the first 33 bits to record a unique number up to about 8 billion. Yes, sounds like a conspiracy theory. Unless, of course, it happens to be. as the British used to say, “spot on.”

        Reply

  • Avatar

    grtazite

    |

    Now we should all know we have been deceived, as we always were anyway.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Norman

    |

    “even though the CDC instructed medical personnel to start counting influenza, heart disease, pulmonary, respiratory, drug overdose, and possibly even car crash deaths as COVID-19 deaths.”

    Why do contrarians have to peddle false, misleading statements like these over and over like a mind numbing mantra? Stick with Truth. I don’t need false information to get emotionally worked up. Most visitors to this blog seem to blindly believe anything written. i doubt any look into the credibility of these blatant false statements. I think this one comes from Facebook and is made up but the author does not care. I guess they think no one will ever investigate false claims.

    Here:
    https://www.factcheck.org/2020/04/social-media-posts-make-baseless-claim-on-covid-19-death-toll/

    The mindless zombies who only believe the contrarian opinion will believe this is fake news. Oh well can’t reach the unwilling.

    I looked at the CDC guidelines and their is zero evidence to support the author’s false and misleading claims. Will he correct his dishonest unsupported claim or continue with his truth distortion because if feeds the zombies. Just make a claim and the mindless will believe it.

    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm

    Here is what the CDC actually says. Find where they tell people to include drug overdoes, car accidents. You won’t be able to because the author is directly quoting bad information and peddling it as it is a fact. If this is a science blog it needs much better research then false statement.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      geran

      |

      Norman, or as you are better know, “con-man”, do you believe you are fooling anyone other than yourself? The vast majority of people that visit this blog can think for themselves. You can’t fool anyone here. But your efforts are hilarious.

      More please.

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Norman

        |

        Geran

        So what do you think I am conning you about. The Author of this article Kevin McCullough made false and unsupported claims. I challenged this false narrative.

        It is like you, an electrical engineer, pretending to be a master of physics. You don’t understand thermodynamics. You don’t know what a radiant flux is. You don’t have actual knowledge of physics so you baffle the uneducated with BS and they think you know what you are talking about. It is funny how you fool the uneducated. Pseudoscience and your made up version is much easier to portray than actual physics which takes effort to learn.

        Reply

        • Avatar

          geran

          |

          Norman, your con-man schtick is all you’ve got. You can’t provide one instance of me getting either the physics, or the thermodynamics, wrong. All you can do is just make big claims. It’s so easy to expose you and your hilarious pseudoscience

          More please.

          Reply

          • Avatar

            Norman

            |

            Geran

            Several times I have proved you don’t know physics and you are wrong using textbook links. You are too arrogant to realize how ignorant you are and how dumb your ideas really are. I could not comment on your knowledge of electricity which could be large. You do not understand other branches of physics a will not attempt to correct your errors when they are proven to be such. One is your inability to understand the concept of flux. It is the amount of energy/second passing through an area. In normal units it is joules/second-meter^2. The energy though the area will add directly when you have more sources of energy passing through. You can’t grasp this and are unwilling to understand it. Arrogance is bliss in your world but it will not help you understand physics. Correcting you is not possible. If you feel I am a “con-man” so be it. It does not make your phony physics any more correct.

          • Avatar

            geran

            |

            Wrong con-man. You’ve never been able to find anything wrong with my physics. Claiming you have is just another one of your cons.

            And, fluxes from different sources can not be added. That’s why you can’t bake a turkey with ice cubes, no matter how many ice cubes you have.

            Hilarious.

    • Avatar

      Finn McCool

      |

      Hi Norman,
      I was not impressed by this article either. I don’t usually pay much attention to shrill headlines such as ‘We’ve been had’. I don’t believe that Doctors are counting drug overdoses or car crashes as COVID fatalities. Although plenty of media outlets would have no hesitation in doing so.
      Although I wouldn’t use factcheck.org to back up the point.
      The link to the CDC website was informative. I also took a look at:
      ICD-10-CM Official Coding and Reporting Guidelines
      There is a danger that not only could deaths be wrongly recorded as COVID-19 fatalities, there is also a danger of over-counting. My own view is that the COVID numbers are so relatively small that it doesn’t make much difference. What will be more interesting to see is the number of deaths in April over the mean of the last 5 years or so and the speed at which the disease hit and receded and the age groups affected.
      That being said. What interests me most is the numbers arising from COVID tests.
      In Scotland circa 50,000 were tested and circa 10,000 were positive.
      Does that mean the overall prevalence is 20%?
      Or, if tests were done on those showing symptoms, does that mean that the 40,000 who tested negative were suffering from something else?
      Is the 50,000 figure heavily biased? Probably!
      I’m not a bio-chemist, so I can’t even begin to make a comment about the reliability of the tests (Specificity, sensitivity etc) but it would seem to point to a hypothesis that asymptomatic infection rates are much higher in the general population than are reported. I would treat any statistical analysis of this outbreak with a high degree of suspicion just because of the ‘known unknown’ of the prevalence of the virus in the general population. That number alone makes a huge difference in estimating the severity of this outbreak.
      Politically, the economic suicide Governments have adopted is far more important than the number of deaths. As is the use of undemocratic powers to ‘lockup’ the whole of society on the merest of excuses. People far more eloquent and knowledgeable than me have written on this.
      One point I would make is regarding the ‘Coronavirus Act of 2020 (25th March 2020) as ‘passed’ by the UK Parliament. This is a huge document and it is inconceivable that this could have been put together in such a short space of time.
      Questions:
      When were the provisions of this Act conceived?
      Who was in charge of creating it?
      Which Departments were involved?
      Which Parliamentary groups were involved?
      Why was an Act of Parliament readily available when the NHS was apparently so unequipped to cope with a viral outbreak which would have required such severe measures?
      A quick look at this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_epidemics
      leads to the conclusion that this outbreak would NOT lead to the zombie apocalypse and the end of the world as we know it.
      Yet it has.
      Cui bono?

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Steve Parker

    |

    For the modelling, which overshot the death rates in the UK and elsewhere, politicians must have used the same “scientist” think tank that came up with the global warming modelling.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via