Nothing Unusual About Current Climate say Scientists

Written by www.co2science.org

Very briefly, Liew et al. (2014) begin their recent report on the climatic history of Taiwan by describing how high-resolution pollen records from four lakes and a bog – which they recovered from both high and low altitudes in northern and southern Taiwan – were used together with radiocarbon dating to develop a 4000-year temperature history of the subtropical mountain island. mwp ipcc 1991

The result of this effort was a temperature history that compares well with trends that previously had been developed for China and Europe. And again, very briefly, it revealed the occurrence of a relatively long cold period from approximately 1920 BC to 30 AD, which was followed by the Roman Warm Period (about 30-360 AD), which was followed by the Dark Ages Cold Period (about 360-760 AD), which was followed by the Medieval Warm Period (about 760-1300 AD), which was followed by the Little Ice Age (about 1300-1850 AD). Then, last of all, the record depicts the gradual development of the Current Warm Period, which at this point in time appears to be at its peak, having not risen further than where it is now over the past couple of decades.

Therefore, in light of these and other well-documented findings that are reported and analyzed in the Medieval Warm Period Project portion of the Data section of our website (co2science.org) – which can readily be accessed here – it can clearly be seen that there is nothing unusual, unnatural or unprecedented about the current state of earth’s warmth, which was clearly eclipsed by the Medieval Warm Period at various locations around the globe.

Read more at www.co2science.org

Related articles:

http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/07/26/is-todays-climate-warmer-than-the-medieval-and-roman-warm-periods/
 
http://chimalaya.org/2012/07/27/is-todays-climate-warmer-than-the-medieval-and-roman-warm-periods/
 

When the IPCC ‘disappeared’ the Medieval Warm Period

 

Comments (5)

  • Avatar

    John Marshall

    |

    Jo.

    Quite correct about the GHE theory, complete scam. Climatology on the other hand is a legitimate part of science provided that accepted physics laws are followed. The GHG theory not being any sort of law in any sense.

  • Avatar

    solvingtornadoes

    |

    Joe,

    Are you really that naive? There are many sciences that pretend to believe/understand notions that are plainly absurd for political reasons. Climatology is only following the precedent set by meteorology.

    Do you think it is not obvious that the reason that you and other pretentious “slayers” of scientific misinformation turn a blind eye to disciplines whose adherents are politically conservative?

    Guess again.

    Direct evidence that meteorologists believe consensus is science:
    http://wp.me/p4JijN-4G

    Government Tornado Researchers: what they don’t want you to know about what they don’t know
    http://wp.me/p4JijN-78

    Cult mentality of Meteorology
    http://wp.me/p4JijN-7b

    • Avatar

      Pat Obar

      |

      [quote name=”solvingtornadoes”]Joe,

      Are you really that naive? There are many sciences that pretend to believe/understand notions that are plainly absurd for political reasons. Climatology is only following the precedent set by meteorology.

      Do you think it is not obvious that the reason that you and other pretentious “slayers” of scientific misinformation turn a blind eye to disciplines whose adherents are politically conservative?

      Guess again.

      Direct evidence that meteorologists believe consensus is science:
      http://wp.me/p4JijN-4G

      Government Tornado Researchers: what they don’t want you to know about what they don’t know
      http://wp.me/p4JijN-78

      Cult mentality of Meteorology
      http://wp.me/p4JijN-7b%5B/quote%5D

      Jim, many, many folk have careful thoughts and consideration. It is open season on all that consider current Meteorology, as something useful.

      • Avatar

        solvingtornadoes

        |

        Don’t think I didn’t notice and appreciate some of the wrangling you took on at Roger Tall Blokes blog. You are one of very few people that has ever confronted the brain-dead meteorological paradigm. I think you eventually came to realize how futile it is to try to explain science to people like Stephen Wilde.

        Did you hear the one about the guy that goes to buy a suit?
        http://wp.me/p4JijN-3j

  • Avatar

    Joseph A Olson

    |

    NO gas molecule can capture, store, amplify or redirect radiation energy as the GHG hypothesis claims. First principle Thermodynamics and Radiation Physic prove this is impossible, but we have suffered a decade of protracted debate from the claimed ‘skeptic/deniers’ who support the false hypothesis and demand more research money to discover the magic, single parameter coefficient that will make this false hypothesis work. This was discussed for two hours on over 600 radio stations recently, see:

    coasttocoastam.com/show/2015/03/18

    Climatology has been a proven FRAUD with no ability to police any of their science crime players. This branch of science MUST be condemned and excised from the body of science.

Comments are closed