No Human-caused Sea Level Rise Say German Scientists

Written by PSI Staff

German scientists show that constant alarmist messages about dramatic and dangerously rising sea levels cannot be confirmed by raw tidal measurements. According to expert Klaus-Eckart Puls “measurements are actually showing the opposite.” Only “mysterious” government computer models show rises in sea levels, says the report.tidal measure

Making the announcement on behalf of the European Institute for Climate and Energy Klaus-Eckart Puls says:

“Worldwide, neither tidal gauge data (200 years) nor satellite data (20 years) show any acceleration of sea level rise. That is in stark contrast to all past and current statements by the IPCC and several climate (research) institutes and climate-models. Moreover, there are indications that the satellite data (showing a higher [double] rate of increase) are significantly “over-corrected.”” [See ref 28 in the report]

‘Mysterious Case’ or Data Rigging?

The European Institute for Climate and Energy expressed their concerns about the reliability of certain official computer models adding, “Instead of adjusting the satellite data to those actually measured on the ground and correcting them downward, the discrepancy between gauge and satellite measurements continue to this date. Somehow, that does not appear to bother anyone. A mysterious case.”

Wilhelmshaven coast scientist, Karl-Ernst Behre from the Lower Saxony Institute for Historical Coastal Research (NIHK ) explains that the best evidence shows sea levels have only been rising naturally “since the end of the last ice age we have good knowledge of the sea level changes on the German North Sea coast.”

The latest German research shows that sea level has risen naturally due to global warming by more than 50 meters in the past 10,000 years, says Behre. It has been nothing to do with humans.

“The increase has increasingly slowed when one considers the overarching trend of the last 3000 years. In the “youngest” 400 years (1600-2000) there have been (without the GIA correction) an increase of 1.35 m, in the past 100 years, only one such 25 cm, thus slowing it down further.”

No Evidence of Increased Floods

The European Institute for Climate are also able to confirm there is no evidence that the floods are getting worse. ‘We have measured the flood levels for 100 years, during which time the mean high water is up by 25cm which fits the natural rise in sea level. There is no evidence of more frequent floods. “

Sea levels alone are not the only factor – changes in the landmass due to the rise and fall of geological movements, especially plate tectonics, volcanism and glacial processes can superficially affect sea levels (Isostasy and Eustasie).

Not helping the cause of alarmism is the fact well-known German land subsidence should be making any supposed sea level rise look even more pronounced, as the report shows.

As for the German North Sea coast Behre explains that in 2011, a work was published on the trends of 15 coastal levels in the German Bight. A graph (see right) detailing the findings shows the actual extent of sea level rises, proving no human signal. German sea level study

This was part of a wider range of studies dealing with the ongoing Holocene vertical land movements of the last millennium in southern Scandinavia, Jutland, the North Frisian Islands, the south arch over Denmark and the middle Baltic Sea. It proved:

“The North Sea basin is already a very long time an area of subsidence, tectonic subsidence and this holds true even today. The German coast lies on the upper part of this reduction area. In the area of the German Bight there is shown to be a tectonically induced mean decrease from 0.64 cm / century, in the West it is 0.54 cm / century as in the east and consequently is overall a small amount.”

As such, the authors are able to confirm there is no trend. All measured changes in sea levels can thus be attributed only to a natural origin conistent with the ongoing glacial retreat our planet has been experiencing since the onset of the Holocene Period around 11,000 years ago.

To read the full report vsit www.eike-klima-energie.eu

 

Tags: , , ,

Comments (4)

  • Avatar

    Quinn

    |

    It’s really very complicated in this busy life
    to listen to news on TV, therefore I simply use internet sites like PSI for that reason, and take
    the newest information.

  • Avatar

    tomwys2

    |

    It is worse: Here’s the Ex-NASA Panel at the Heartland Climate Conference ICCC-9 – the first talk in the videoclip deals with satellite sea-levelI matters (and the rest is well worth watching too). The NASA old timers do know something about satellites!!!:

    http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/49724714

    One of the slides clearly shows the resolution difficulties and orbital positioning lack of precision.

  • Avatar

    John Marshall

    |

    This is Marine Regression and Marine Transgression– helped in forming the coal fields. climate in the Carboniferous was warmer than today and atmospheric O2 levels were higher than today to give the then giant insects the energy to get airborne. CO2 levels were probably much higher given the coal measure sequestering that occurred. global temperatures were a result of landmass distribution not CO2.

  • Avatar

    Martin Hodgkins

    |

    The last time we had a similar climate (taking the long view) was in the Carboniferous period and sea levels were up and down (interglacials) like the proverbial tarts knickers. We call the cycles cyclothems ranging from fine sediment to coarse grained sediments and
    then back again as shorelines advanced only to be covered by rising sea levels.

    As a dry stone waller I have delighted in the predictable changes in rock type as I move up a hillside and can see how these
    cyclothems have shaped the landscape. When you can see the current situation in context then the normality of the present is clear.
    People need to be educated in geological history so they can see that the present is normal not some human induced abnormality.

Comments are closed