NASA Exposed in ‘Massive’ New Climate Data Fraud

Written by P Gosselin,

by P Gosselin,

Veteran award-winning journalist Günter Ederer reports of a shocking new global warming data fraud in NASA’s global temperature data series, as relied on by the UN and government climate scientists. NASA FRAUD The data has been carefully analysed by a respected data computation expert Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert and is being made publicly available for independent verification.

Professor Ewert’s findings seem to show NASA has intentionally and systematically rigged the official government record of global temperatures to show recent global warming where none would exist without the upwards ‘revisions.’

The astonishing results are now available online to the public.  P Gosselin of reports:

Ederer reports not long ago retired geologist and data computation expert Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert began looking at the data behind the global warming claims, and especially the datasets of NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS).

Ewert painstakingly examined and tabulated the reams of archived data from 1153 stations that go back to 1881 – which NASA has publicly available – data that the UN IPCC uses to base its conclusion that man is heating the Earth’s atmosphere through the burning of fossil fuels. According to Ederer, what Professor Ewert found is “unbelievable”:

From the publicly available data, Ewert made an unbelievable discovery: Between the years 2010 and 2012 the data measured since 1881 were altered so that they showed a significant warming, especially after 1950. […] A comparison of the data from 2010 with the data of 2012 shows that NASA-GISS had altered its own datasets so that especially after WWII a clear warming appears – although it never existed.”

Ederer writes that Ewert particularly found alterations at stations in the Arctic. Professor Ewert randomly selected 120 stations from all over the world and compared the 2010 archived data to the 2012 data and found that they had been tampered to produce warming.

The old data showed regular cycles of warming and cooling over the period, even as atmospheric CO2 concentration rose from 0.03% to 0.04%. According to the original NASA datasets, Ederer writes, the mean global temperature cooled from 13.8°C in 1881 to 12.9°C in 1895. Then it rose to 14.3°C by 1905 and fell back under 12.9°C by 1920, rose to 13.9°C by 1930, fell to 13° by 1975 before rising to 14°C by 2000. By 2010 the temperature fell back to 13.2°C.

But then came the “massive” altering of data, which also altered the entire overall trend for the period. According to journalist Ederer, Ewert uncovered 10 different methods NASA used to alter the data. The 6 most often used methods were:

• Reducing the annual mean in the early phase.
• Reducing the high values in the first warming phase.
• Increasing individual values during the second warming phase.
• Suppression of the second cooling phase starting in 1995.
• Shortening the early decades of the datasets.
• With the long-term datasets, even the first century was shortened.

The methods were employed for stations such as Darwin, Australia and Palma de Mallorca, for example, where cooling trends were suddenly transformed into warming.

Ewert (pictured) then discovered that NASA having altered the datasets once in March 2012 was not enough. EWERT Alterations were made again in August 2012, and yet again in December 2012. For Palma de Majorca: “Now because of the new datasets it has gotten even warmer. Now they show a warming of +0.01202°C per year.”

Using earlier NASA data, globe is in fact cooling

The veteran German journalist Ederer writes that the media reports of ongoing global warming are in fact not based on reality at all, but rather on “the constantly altered temperatures of the earlier decades.” Ederer adds:

Thus the issue of man-made global warming has taken on a whole new meaning: Yes, it is always man-made if the data are adjusted to fit the theory. The meticulous work by Ewert has predecessors, and fits a series of scandals and contradictions that are simply being ignored by the political supporters of man-made climate change.”

Ederer also brings up the analysis by American meteorologists Joseph D’Aleo and Anthony Watts who examined 6000 NASA measurement stations and found an abundance of measurement irregularities stemming in large part from serious siting issues. According to Ederer the findings by Professor Ewert are in close agreement with those of Watts and D’Aleo.

Ederer writes of the overall findings by Professor Ewert:

Using the NASA data from 2010 the surface temperature globally from 1940 until today has fallen by 1.110°C, and since 2000 it has fallen 0.4223°C […]. The cooling has hit every continent except for Australia, which warmed by 0.6339°C since 2000. The figures for Europe: From 1940 to 2010, using the data from 2010, there was a cooling of 0.5465°C and a cooling of 0.3739°C since 2000.”

Ederer summarizes that in view of the magnitude of the scandal, one would think that there would be in investigation. Yet he does not believe this will be the case because the global warming has turned into a trillion-dollar industry and that that too much is tied to it.

All datasets are available to the public at any time. The studies by Prof. Ewert may be requested by e-mail:

*Günter Ederer is a former journalist for ARD and ZDF German Television and has won numerous awards.

 See more at:

Comments (16)

  • Elite media is creating fake news about "fake news"


    […] many examples of failure-to-report, those related to climate change include the lack of coverage of NASA temperature data fraud and the solar cycle that impacts global […]

  • Anonymous


    […] of those emails so we can see them saying they were falsifying data. The Emails say different. NASA Exposed in ?Massive? New Climate Data Fraud – Principia Scientific International derer reports not long ago retired geologist and data computation expert Professor Dr. […]

  • Trump demands apology from Hamilton cast - Page 49


    […] stop being so corrupt and stop manipulating data they would not be under suspicion of corruption NASA Exposed in ?Massive? New Climate Data Fraud – Principia Scientific International NOAA caught adjusting temperature data to make global warming worse! But why did they do it? – […]

  • Atheists go after football coach for what they call 'pray to play' baptism - Page 85


    […] Originally Posted by Michael J You have a couple of very large logical fallacies right there, both of which you have made several times before. In the post that this quote responds to, I asked you to tell me what you think Evolutionary Theory says. I asked you this because you claim to reject the Theory of Evolution, and I have a strong hunch that you don't even know what the theory says. Instead of answering my question, you make yet another Poisoning the Well fallacy, where you attempt to point out something unpleasant (and in this case, demonstrably false) about me. So I will ask you the question again: What do you think the Theory of Evolution says? By that, I am not referring exclusively to Speciation. I'm asking you what the entire theory (including both Micro and Macro Evolution) says? This logical fallacy is called a Red Herring, where you bring up something irrelevant to the discussion topic. Global Warming and the Theory of Evolution are entirely different things. The former says fossil fuel emissions trap heat in the Earth's atmosphere, and the latter is a measurement of organisms' changes in their gene frequencies over time. Assuming that is even true, that wouldn't disprove the Theory of Evolution. Just because the climatologists were wrong doesn't mean all the biologists were wrong, too. I drew the comparison of global warming and evolution to show both were determined by scientist. Global warming scientist were caught fudging climate details to justify their theory. If scientist did that with Global warming why should I trust scientist with Evolution NASA Exposed in ?Massive? New Climate Data Fraud – Principia Scientific International […]

  • The Climate Change Lie


    […] taking of ground temperature readings in paved-over/concrete-covered urban areas (heat sinks) and other such manipulations, which give a distorted (arguably, a deliberately dishonest) impression of average temperatures and […]

  • Anonymous


    […] Originally Posted by Michael J That is just a Genetic Fallacy Genetic fallacy – RationalWiki Whether the data about climate change is true or not, climate science has nothing to do with liberalism or religion. You can't prove that it is. That makes no sense. it makes all kinds of sense. go back to the time when Al Gore lost the race to George Bush in 2000, which I call the "Hanging Chad Election" Gore wins the popular vote and Bush wins the delegates. It goes to the Supreme court to settle the issue and Bush wins by a vote. This turns Al Gore into a raving fool that comes up with this Global Warming idea. Combine that with the possible carbon tax that he wants to propose and Liberal politicians see the possibility of a tax boom in this country to pay for all the Liberal entitlements they want to give away to Democrat voters to keep them in office. There is a big reception by the public with is idea and a lot of people are buying it. As the years go by the temperatures of the earth go down and the term "Global Warming " is replaced with Climate Change because it just doesn't fit what the earth is doing anymore. Enter the Nasa fraud cover up. NASA Exposed in ?Massive? New Climate Data Fraud – Principia Scientific International. […]

  • Climate Change: Is it true? – bringthepaineblog


    […] here is where the questioning comes in. The data has been unbelievably doctored by a ton of people, but the facts do remain. Methane is one of the worst insulators but is rarely […]

Comments are closed