Mysterious, ‘Dr X’ says Universe Is NOT Expanding
Written by Joseph A Olson, PE
What first began as ‘rumored’ science on conservative websites is now being reinforced by what can only be described as the foremost authority on the Expanding Universe. The thought that there was a Non Expanding Theory has been introduced by a trained engineer, who has turned rouge astronomer.
The following quote from Dr X does add credibility to this challenge to eight decades of ‘settled’ science:
Dr X has “admitted that the expanding universe might be an illusion, but implied that this was a cautious and colorless view. Last week it was apparent that he had shifted his position even further away from a literal interpretation of red shift, that he now regards the expanding universe as more improbable than a non-expanding one.” 
What gives this Dr X usurper, along with that engineer turned rogue astronomer, the right to challenge this cornerstone of modern astronomy ?
The identity of the mysterious Dr X is none other than “Mount Wilson Observatory’s brilliant Astronomer Edwin Powell Hubble,” who with coworker Milton LaSalle Humason first observed the red-shift of light from distant stars. Continuing, “It was assumed that the distant nebulae were retreating in all directions.”
One interesting fact is that this interview was for Time Magazine and was published as “Science: Shift on Shift” on Dec 14, 1936. Here you have proof that the ‘father of the Expanding Universe Theory’ had misgivings just years after his 1929 disclosure. Following the motto of P T Barnum, of “there’s a sucker born every minute” the existing ‘big science’ teams saw an unlimited opportunity to expand astronomy budgets.
The ‘sucker’ in this case is the taxpayer, forced by errant bureaucrats for fund side-show science on an ever expanding universe with ever expanding grants, awards and fellowships. Bureaucrats do have an affection for expanding concepts, witness the vast expansion of planetary maladies they have been able to ascribe to the ‘expansion of carbon dioxide’ gas in our atmosphere.
Dr Hubble (the previous mentioned Dr X) made his scientific discoveries on the 100 inch Hooker telescope, the world’s largest at the time. In the Times interview, he communicated to the National Academy of Sciences that:
“The distribution of these bodies [distant nebulae] in space forced him to conclude
that a non-expanding universe theory is more economical and less vulnerable”
Page 2 (Dr X)
Having birthed this brand of Franken-science the good doctor was now powerless to stop what now had a life of its own. He was “now willing to abandon the expanding universe to mathematical cosmologists” and they we only too happy for this new gravy train.
In a Pontius Pilate moment during the interview, Dr Hubble states his hope that the new 200 inch Caltech super telescope to be completed in the 1940’s would settle this question. Since the ability to gather light is a function of area, and therefore of a square, this new eye in the sky could see four times as much, four times as far back, as the Hooker telescope.
What dismayed Dr Hubble at the time was that the speed of the then edge of the universe was “equal to 25,000 miles per second”. This was the speed that Milky Way sized galaxies were perceived to be moving. The world had to take time out to counter a virulent form of ‘master race planet domination’ which caused a delay in completing of the 200 inch Mt Palomar telescope until 1948.
When even deeper space light was showing even greater ‘apparent acceleration’ the mathematical cosmologists descended on the witless bureaucrats at the NAS for an ever expanding list of fanciful solutions, including dark matter, invisible universes and vacuum energy.
No, this is not the tattooed armband coordinates for Anglia Jolie’s latest offspring. This is the name for the newest and most distant cluster galaxy estimated at 9.6 billion light years away and closest yet observed to the 13.7 year old universe edge. As the speed of these supposed distant galaxies are now approaching the actual speed of light, we are left to question some of the hypothesis of these bureaucratically over fed cosmologists.
One must question the hypothesis that 90% of the matter in the universe is invisible dark matter, yet light is able to pass such great distances unblocked and un-absorbed. The supposed vacuum force is many times greater than gravity, but curiously also invisible.
The last count on invisible universes also included five invisible dimensions. In addition to the four ‘visible dimensions’ of length, width, depth and time there were sorcerers equations for five more dimensions. A radio interview last week indicated that a hopeful cosmologist was seeking grants for two new additional invisible dimensions.
Page 3 (Dr X)
With unlimited funding we will soon find that we live in a universe with more invisible dimensions than Starbucks locations. What began with a real scientist and a Hooker at the observatory has turned into a science whorehouse. What we must do is to show these spend thrifts the real meaning of ‘invisible’ as in the invisible universe that we are all now experiencing.
We must show these NAS pimps and their cosmologist harlots the meaning of ‘invisible paycheck’, ‘invisible pension’ and ‘invisible health benefits’. It is time for the honest voices of science to demand that this circus side show be closed. I’m certain that Dr X would heartily agree. By the way, that engineer turned rouge astronomer is ME.
Other Non Expanding Models
This “Dr X” article was fourth in a series on alternatives to the big bang hypothesis and was posted at Canada Free Press on May 22, 2010. It seemed odd that not only was the big bang Universe accelerating at ‘astronomical speed’, but uniformly in every direction, making the Earth the ‘center’ of another Ptolemaic, flat Earth styled model. My articles had suggested that angular acceleration also causes a red shift, and might account for this spectrum artifact without the leaps of faith in the big bang model. I was shocked when a CFP reader told me that this had been proposed before, and suggested I research the Einstein-Godel Metric. This excerpt from Wiki explains the metric and its implications:
In 1949, he [Godel] demonstrated the existence of solutions involving closed time-line curves, to Albert Einstein’s field equations in general relativity. He is said to have given this elaboration to Einstein on his 70th birthday. His “Rotating Universes” would allow time travel to the past and caused Einstein to have doubts about his own theory. His solutions are known as the Godel metric (an exact solution of the Einstein field equation).
What followed was an additional series of articles exploring the necessary components for humans to develop the axiomatic, limited time travel and the circumstantial evidence that all of the requisite technologies have been in place for decades . The later series also explores the options of a Curved Universe and the “Helical Travel of Light”  as factors in the observable red shift, and that CONSCIOUS is in fact the fifth dimension. This relevant comment was made in a climate science blog….”97% of the Universe is composed of hyper-dense equations and math particles”.
Page 4 (Dr X)
Abstract mathematical purity can exist independent of actual reality, and does not dictate reality as the Ptolemaic model so well illustrates. If the Universe is in fact rotating, and if limited past time travel is axiomatic then the implications for humanity are no esoteric, they are profound. There would be NO crime that could any longer be a mystery. Human beings would feel enormous pressure to “do unto others as you would have done to you”. With this newly expanded conscious, humanity could then experience the Thousand Years of Light and Eden on Earth prophecies. You do not have to subscribe to a particular religious belief to recognize that we have historically not been our own best neighbors.
Part of the problem for humanity is an entrenched feudal system in control of vast portions of production and information. These ruling monarch-monopolists would be the first exposed by limited time travel, and have therefore overtly funded the big bang hypothesis with the same zeal as the Carbon climate forcing fraud. It is this author’s firm opinion that wider discussion on a range of current false paradigm reality, “settled” science can only be of benefit for civilization .
Joseph A Olson, PE
May 12, 2014
 The “Shift on Shift” interview with the “father of big bang”, Edwin Hubble was
Published on Dec 14, 1936 and at the time of my CFP post was at Time(.)com.
This article was then placed behind a subscriber paywall.
 The required celestial components were the Cosmic Background Radiation and the
“spin” of cosmic dust, available with space based telescopes and an Apollo visit to
the Moon. Then the other required technology was vast computing power, a very
accurate GPS system and holographic projection. All of these components have
been in place and compartmentalized since the mid eighties.
 Light has been a paradox of ‘particle v wave’ for centuries. Chemical Engineer, Bob
Ashworth researched and published a solution to this duality, that a photon ‘particle’
moving in a helical path, creating a wave, and is therefore both of the solutions. See
“Confirmation of the Helical Travel of Light” in Physical Essays.
 Curious minds are invited to the FauxScienceSlayer site for a series of articles
covering the false paradigm science of Carbon climate forcing, ‘sustainable’ energy,
‘peak’ oil and the big bang, as well as corrections to the elitist directed history meme.