Greenhouse Gas Climate Theory ‘inadmissible’ and ‘junk science’

heller

Global warming science in full meltdown. Influential climate analyst Tony Heller exposes key errors made 115 years ago by the “grandfather” of greenhouse gas theory. The findings, say Heller, make the climate theory of Swedish Chemist Svante Arrhenius “inadmissible” and “junk science.”

Heller’s analysis could have huge implications. US President-elect, Donald Trump, given a populist mandate to dismantle the “hoax” of man-made global warming, is set to target the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) for its wasteful multi-billion dollar climate change boondoggle.

Leading Trump’s EPA transition team is Myron Ebell, the Director of Energy and Environment at the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI). Ebell and Heller are long-time friends championing skepticism of establishment climate alarm.

On the skeptic’s side Heller has consistently and successfully pinpointed for years where precisely government climate data has been used and abused. With this latest revelation Heller goes right to the core of the science itself: the greenhouse gas theory.

Heller notes: “In 1901, Knut Angstrom showed that Arrhenius didn’t know what he was talking about with his global warming theories. CO2 absorption is already nearly saturated, so additional increases in CO2 have little effect.”

The evidence Heller refers to was identified several years ago by fellow skeptic researchers, Hans slayersSchreuder and Alan Siddons. Schreuder and Siddons collaborated with a select team of international experts (the ‘Slayers’) focusing on the greenhouse gas theory itself for careful examination.  It was their groundbreaking book, ‘Slaying the Sky Dragon: Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory’ (2010) that exposed Arrhenius and the evidence Heller cites.

Unfortunately, several years passed while most skeptics still held true to the Arrhenius theory. As such, the debate among academics was confined to “how much” warming was due to carbon dioxide. But the ‘Slayers’ were mainly experts from the “hard” sciences and industry where it is known that CO2 is innocent and is only ever proven to be a coolant. All the empirical evidence from reality (not computer models) proves that CO2 can never “trap heat” or “delay cooling” as the believers in greenhouse gas theory monotonously preach. Indeed, CO2 has been used for decades as a preferred and reliable coolant in refrigerators.

In fact, an irony of ironies, world-leading car manufacturer Mercedes-Benz recently announced they are to install CO2 air conditioners in their prized executive vehicles.

As one car article relates:

“Mercedes will be first to market with a carbon-dioxide refrigerant, an eco-friendly alternative that promises greater fuel economy, quicker cooling, and faster defrosting.”

http://blog.caranddriver.com/global-cooling-mercedes-to-debut-air-conditioning-with-co2-refrigerant/

Meanwhile back in a public presentation at Harbertonford, Devon, England (November 7, 2011) Schreuder explained:

From a colleague, Joe Olsen, I quote the following:

The main reason behind our earth having a benign climate was proposed by Swedish

scientist Svante Arrhenius towards the end of the 19th century. It was his idea that our

atmosphere acts like a greenhouse. Unfortunately for Arrhenius, he was wrong in 1896

when he first proposed his “greenhouse effect” idea, then proven wrong by Knut

Angstrom for failing to control water vapor in his original experiment and then proved

wrong again by Angstrom & Koch in 1900 (see ref. 1)

Soon after that, a Mr Langley was proven wrong with his Lunar temperature readings in

1903 and finally forced Arrhenius to admit errors in 1906 and finally, in 1909, Professor

Robert Wood proved there is no greenhouse effect (ref. 2), a test that was successfully

repeated by Mexican Professor Nasif Nahle (ref. 3).

The debate was finally put to rest by the American Meteorological Society “Compendium

of Meteorology” in 1951.

Initially, man-made global warming never was widely accepted and was abandoned when

it was found that all the heat coming off the earth that was supposedly absorbed by carbon

dioxide was already absorbed by water vapour.

Even in the driest places on Earth the atmosphere contains some 3,000 water molecules

for every carbon dioxide molecule and keeping in mind how little carbon dioxide we

humans have actually added to our atmosphere – only some 3 percent (ref. 4) – there are

some 10,000 water molecules for every “human-produced” carbon dioxide molecule, all

absorbing in the same range of thermal radiation frequencies coming off the earth.

As an aside, for the scientifically minded amongst us: CO2 does have a unique absorption

in the 5 micron range, but every absorb/emit causes a frequency shift rendering the emitted

photon invisible.

A three atom molecule in free motion has no ability to ‘redirect’ the outgoing long wave

radiation, it merely vibrates as the photon passes.

In the bigger picture, it is the Sun that heats the Earth and the Earth then heats the

atmosphere, not the other way around. (ref. 5)

The atmosphere acts in two opposing manners: it cools the earth during the hours of

sunshine and it delays the cooling in the hours of no sunshine and during the night.

But at no stage does the atmosphere make the earth warmer, not by any means.

Thank you.

REFERENCES

  1. http://doc.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/mwr/029/mwr-29-06-0268.pdf

[US Monthly Weather Review, June 1901]

  1. http://www.tech-know-group.com/archives/Note_on_the_Theory_of_the_Greenhouse.pdf
  2. https://principia-scientific.com/pso/publications/Experiment_on_Greenhouse_Effect.pdf
  3. http://www.tech-know-group.com/archives/IPCC_deception.pdf
  4. http://www.tech-know-group.com/archives/SUN_heats_EARTH.pdf

 

Share via