I write this before Feynman’s Blunder—Part 1 has been published. I do so because at the end of this article I had written: ‘This article was titled (Feynman’s Blunder—Part 1) because I want to give a reader an opportunity to comment as to what his blunder was.” For I anticipate (hypothesize) that there will be no comments. For if this proves to be the case, Feynman’s Blunder has more members who are at fault for not correcting his most elementary blunder. Of course, I recognize that such a conclusion implies that someone actually read Feynman’s Blunder—Part 1 to the end. However, if a reader of PSI articles did not read this short article to the end, it only confirms that they are part of the problem—uninformed people about what good science is—which PSI is trying to correct. “The essence of genuine scientific inquiry shall exemplify the sui generis, or the abiding maxim that goodness is indefinable and exists in science only insofar as the pursuit of truth ought to be our abiding goal.” I send this introduction of this article to John O’Sullivan so there is a witness that I wrote it before Feynman’s Blunder—Part 1 had been published. For this previous article is an experiment.