Edsel Chromie: Electromagnetism & Greenhouse Gas Radiative Heat

Sunburn and those resultant blisters are caused by ultraviolet rays radiated from the Sun. A fact known and accepted by scientists and the general public for decades. We also use the resistance of electric energy to create the heat of electric stoves and the light of incandescent light bulbs.

So it is entirely feasible for the Sun to radiate other wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum below the wavelength of visible light to create the heat and light wherever it encounters the resistance of another magnetic field.

flood

This concept is the only possible way many of the bizarre temperature differentials in the solar system can be explained within the parameters of the Laws of Thermodynamics and the Laws of Physics and in conformance with the germination and enhancement of living vegetation.

On Sunday Oct. 30, 2016 the National Geographic station broadcast Leonardo DaCaprio’s “Before the Flood” [image above]. This film by the Hollywood’s climate alarmist poster boy details many aspect of global warming and its potential effects in many areas of the environment.

Radiated heat from the Sun does not conform to the fact that there is ice on the planet Mercury, a temperature of only 100+ degrees on Earth, 700 degrees on Venus and a temperature hotter than the surface of the Sun in some areas of Jupiter. Only the concept of radiated magnetic field current that creates heat in proportion to the resistance it encounters can explain the relative distance and the observed results.

In 1979 I wrote to NASA regarding my concept of the abnormal heat of Jupiter. In a snail mail letter I received from the late Dr. Thomas A. Mutch, Associate Administrator for Space Science at NASA dated Aug. 14, 1979, he wrote:

“Thank you for your letter of July 25, 1979. Your ideas regarding the heating of the ionized plasma near Jupiter are interesting. Our scientists have been investigating the magnetosphere of Jupiter as a source of energy for this plasma. No doubt you will be reading further of these findings. Thank you for your views.”

In a Feb. 8, 1979 San Diego Union-Tribune newspaper article it stated:

“New data from Pioneer spacecraft show Venus as a hellish planet of hot clouds, sulfuric sleet, crashing lightning, swirling winds and strange, glowing fires on the side of the planet facing away from the Sun that could come from chemical fires. The wicked solar winds, with speeds up to a million miles an hour and temperatures up to 1.8 million degrees, swirl in Venus’ atmosphere and the edges of its upper atmosphere. Farther down, the atmosphere is clear before it reaches the red mark and 847 degree F. temperature near its surface.”

In an Aug. 31, 1979 Newspaper article it states:

“Io volcanically spews sulfur and oxygen more than a hundred miles above its surface to create a highly charged orbital pathway that influences the entire magnetosphere of Jupiter. It has what physicists call a flux tube, a magnetic link from its surface to Jupiter that carries five million amps of electricity, causing gigantic auroras at Jupiter’s poles.”

In a Sept. 7, 1979 newspaper article it stated:

“Saturn’s magnetic and rotational axes practically coincide, unlike Earth and Jupiter, whose axes are tilted apart from each other. This makes Saturn unique, and the discovery will force rethinking about how planetary dynamos work.”

In a June 10, 1979 newspaper article it stated:

“Gases surrounding Jupiter are hotter than the Sun. Jupiter has a balloon of gases surrounding it that is 100 times hotter than those spewn off the Sun;s surface. Jupiter is inside an envelope of charged particles, with a temperature of 350 million to 400 million degrees Celsius or about 750 million degrees F. , 100 times hotter than the corona of the Sun. The envelope was discovered by a Low Energy Charged Particle experiment on the NASA Voyager 1 spacecraft. Even the interior of the Sun is estimated to be less than 20 million degrees, said Dr. T. P. Armstrong of the U. of Kansas.”

All of these temperature measurements contradict the radiated heat per se concept from the Sun and has defied a comprehensive explanation from the science community for over 35 years.

What have open-minded and inquisitive scientists been doing to try to explain this obvious mathematical and physical impossibility under the radiated heat belief?

The variable temperature in respect to the solar system as well as the variable temperature in the atmosphere of each individual planet and moon is not consistent with any explanation of radiated heat from the Sun or the planets or moons.

It is consistent with the concept of radiated magnetic field current from the Sun generating heat as it encounters the resistance of the magnetic fields of each individual planet and moon in exact proportion to the intensity of the magnetic field or resistance of ferrous minerals or gases it encounters.

I understood in 1979 that it would be impossible for simple radiated heat from the Sun to create these variable conditions in the solar system. That is why I saved the above newspaper reports that substantiate my contention.

I don’t understand why the science community obstinately adhered to the radiated heat belief for over 35 years and continue to hang onto the coat tails of the 15th century scientists and their beliefs.

Those 15th century scientists did not have the technology of today to add to their understanding of the universe. It should be embarrassing that modern scientists have space probes to help them understand the universe and yet choose to ignore the data and discoveries made by the spacecraft.

It can be easily seen that instead of the greenhouse belief, the radiated magnetic field current from the Sun meets little resistance from the outer magnetic field of the Earth and generates heat in direct proportion to the increased magnetic field intensity as it reaches closer to the Earth’s surface. And, it meets higher resistance from ferrous minerals and steel surfaces resulting in much higher temperatures.

esa

In the atmosphere the heat is increased by the added resistance of carbon and other particulates in the air that increases the heat of the atmosphere. Since the Earth has a magnetic field, it attracts the magnetic field current flow from the Sun toward its core mass. This results in the magnetic field flow from the Sun being more concentrated in the area between the core of the Earth and the Sun at all times during the day and during the various solstice positions. It is not the angle of incidence but the attraction of the energy toward the core mass that creates the higher temperature at the noon position at all times with a lower temperature around the core mass position.

My concept accords with the proven resistance of electromagnetic energy in our daily use of energy for heating and industrial induction furnaces. Likewise it fits the way we produce light by the resistance of a magnetic field current flow through the gases of fluorescent tubes and sodium lamps. The invention of complex and convoluted concoctions of “greenhouse gases” and other similar beliefs are totally unnecessary when a very simple explanation proven by many activities in our daily lives exhibit the very same heat and light.

Some scientists who obviously have not contributed anything toward the advancement of science have criticized Principia-Scientific.org for publishing articles written by “crackpots”. They would be better to criticize the science community because when the space program began they boasted that they knew everything about the universe and the space probes were simply to confirm their theories. Now, after Dr. Bradford Smith said in 1980: “Our once tidy theories have all been shot to hell by Voyager” NASA begins all of their “Unexplained Files” programs by stating: “There is more that we do not know about the universe than we know.”

If the science community used the funds they were provided and used their heads they certainly should know more about the universe now, not less.

******

Edsel Chromie is a retired science writer and World War Two Navy veteran with expertise in electric systems. While in the service of his country he applied his knowledge of magnetic field currents through a wire to determine electrical damage in US Navy torpedoes. He has four approved patents on solar energy and Sun chromietracking systems. Over several decades Chromie has applied his unique insight into interpreting various natural phenomena.
Today Edsel writes for Principia Scientific International about this unique set of life experiences which has guided his scientific understanding. His insights, unrecognised by the scientific community, may provide answers to yet unexplained phenomena. You can write to Ed Chromie at this address:[email protected]

 

Trackback from your site.

Leave a comment

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Share via