• Home
  • Current News
  • Another Independent Paper Confirms Slayer’s Debunk of Alarmist Greenhouse Effect

Another Independent Paper Confirms Slayer’s Debunk of Alarmist Greenhouse Effect

Written by Joseph E Postma

The paper can be found here: New Insights on the Physical Nature of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect Deduced from an Empirical Planetary Temperature Model.

Pertinent quote:

Atmospheric back radiation and surface temperature: Since (according to Eq. 10b) the equilibrium GMAT of a planet is mainly determined by the TOA solar irradiance and surface atmospheric pressure, the downwelling LW radiation appears to be globally a product of the air temperature rather than a driver of the surface warming. In other words, on a planetary scale, the so-called back radiation is a consequence of the atmospheric thermal effect rather than a cause for it. This explains the broad variation in the size of the observed downwelling LW flux among celestial bodies irrespective of the amount of absorbed solar radiation. Therefore, a change in this thermal flux brought about by a shift in atmospheric LW emissivity cannot be expected to impact the global surface temperature.

Among other things, this is what the Slayers have said as well, long ago: the thermal energy in the atmosphere and the atmosphere’s radiation is a consequence of its temperature, not its cause! There’s no independent internal source of radiation in or from the atmosphere, therefore any such radiation from the atmosphere is a consequence, not a cause.  The Slayers had also pointed out long ago that atmospheric pressure and the temperature gradient is what determines near-surface-air temperature.  It is great to see our original work reproduced with mathematical rigor.

My approach has been to simply show the fundamentals of where things go wrong with the basis of climate alarm and its radiative greenhouse effect, because it is actually quite simple, and you learn some real physics and logic in the process!

The radiative greenhouse effect is finished.  Climate alarm and the brand of politics that supported it is finished.  Great work and kudos to the authors!

Read more at Climate of Sophistry

Trackback from your site.

Comments (3)

  • Avatar

    Brian

    |

    Thank you Mr.Olson for your time and comment. I am acutely aware of the scam being a science geek since 7th grade on up.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Brian

    |

    Jun 1, 2017 Watch: Climate Depot’s Morano in Sky News TV debate on Trump Paris climate with Greenpeace activist

    Marc Morano vs. Sky News Anchor Kay Burley and a Kaisa Kosonen, a spokesperson from Greenpeace International.

    https://youtu.be/CGIgthpk9kc

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Joseph Olson

    |

    There is NO greenhouse gas, the WarmMonger and Lukewarmists debate is fake. One cannot describe a massive, dynamic, chaotic system with an anecdotal, linear, single parameter hypothesis, nor correct a false hypothesis.

    Anecdotal evidence is NOT EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE….the many defects in our current, false paradigm reality were discussed in two hour radio interview at

    CoastToCoastAM.com/show/2017/06/01

    Reply

Leave a comment